TABLE 2.

Efficacy of ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT Visual Analysis in Diagnosing Surgically Eligible PA Patients and Comparison with Adrenal CT and AVS in Patients with Pathology and Postoperative Follow-up

Modality	TP	TN	FP	FN	Sensitivity	Specificity	Accuracy	PPV	NPV
Both CT and PET/CT^*
Adrenal CT	55	6	7	17	76.4% (65.4%–84.7%)	46.2% (23.3%–70.9%)	71.8% (62.2%–81.3%)	88.7% (78.5%–94.4%)	26.1% (12.5%–46.5%)
PET/CT	70	8	1	6	92.1% (86.0%–98.2%)	88.9% (68.3%–100%)	91.8% (85.9%–97.6%)	98.6% (95.9%–100%)	57.1% (31.2%–83.1%)
Both AVS and PET/CT^†
AVS	10	2	2	3	76.9% (49.7%–91.8%)	50.0% (15.0%–85.0%)	70.6% (48.9%–92.2%)	83.3% (55.2%–95.3%)	40.0% (11.8%–77.0%)
PET/CT	11	3	1	2	84.6% (57.8%–95.7%)	75.0% (30.0%–95.4%)	82.4% (64.2%–100%)	91.7% (76.0%–100%)	60.0% (23.1%–88.2%)

↵* n = 85.
↵^† n = 17.
TP = true-positive; TN = true-negative; FP = false-positive; FN = false-negative; PPV = positive prediction value; NPV = negative prediction value.
Data in parentheses are 95% CIs.