TABLE 1.

Kinetic Analysis Results

Patient no.	Sex	V_T	K₁	K₁/k₂	BP_ND	vB
EC-07	F	1.17	1.62	0.51	1.31	0.15
EC-10	M	0.63	1.42	0.28	1.23	0.16
EC-13	F	0.99	1.58	0.42	1.34	0.18
EC-20	M	1.20	2.67	0.39	2.12	0.18
EC-23	M	0.83	1.26	0.31	1.66	0.13
CIG-12	M	1.10	2.71	0.57	0.93	0.14
CIG-14	M	4.74	2.29	3.42	0.39	0.14
CIG-17	M	1.14	3.24	0.52	1.21	0.16
CIG-22	F	1.45	2.70	0.66	1.29	0.11
CIG-24	F	1.06	1.62	0.51	1.09	0.15
CON-01	F	1.15	1.95	0.58	0.98	0.18
CON-03	M	1.04	1.85	0.48	1.17	0.15
CON-05	M	0.91	1.37	0.40	1.27	0.15
CON-06	F	1.53	3.19	0.74	1.07	0.17
CON-09	M	1.18	1.62	0.56	1.13	0.13
ECs		0.97 ± 0.24	1.71 ± 0.56	0.38 ± 0.09^*	1.53 ± 0.37^*	0.16 ± 0.02
CIGs		1.90 ± 1.60	2.51 ± 0.60	1.13 ± 1.28	0.98 ± 0.36	0.14 ± 0.02
CONs		1.16 ± 0.23	1.99 ± 0.70	0.55 ± 0.13	1.12 ± 0.11	0.16 ± 0.02
All		1.34 ± 0.97	2.07 ± 0.67	0.69 ± 0.77	1.21 ± 0.37	0.15 ± 0.02
P		0.36	0.09	0.03	0.02	0.31

↵* P < 0.05 on comparison between ECs and NUs.
EC = EC user; CIG = combustible cigarette user; CON = control.
Data are mean values and mean ± SD. P values are from Kruskal–Wallis test comparing 3 groups.