|
|
• As the total accumulative activity of administered 131I increases, the likelihood of a response to a subsequent 131I therapy decreases. However, no maximum accumulated threshold of administered 131I activity should designate a patient’s metastatic disease as radioiodine refractory.
|
• One metastatic lesion that is classified as radioiodine refractory does not necessarily mean the patient is now radioiodine refractory. Combination therapy of direct focal therapy (e.g., surgery, external-beam radiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, embolization, radioisotope embolization) or/with targeted therapy (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, etc.) in combination with 131I therapy may benefit the patient.
|
• Progression, in and of itself, is not a criterion that a 131I therapy has “failed” and that a patient’s metastatic disease is “radioiodine refractory.” Additional factors, such as duration of progression-free survival and administered activity of 131I are important.
|