Resident’s subspecialty | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Undecided (n = 35) | NM (n = 9) | Radiology (n = 70) | P* |
Age (y) | 0.259† | |||
20 − 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
26–30 | 21 | 2 | 24 | |
31–35 | 10 | 4 | 41 | |
36–40 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
41+ | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
Not indicated | 1 | 1 | ||
Sex | 0.981‡ | |||
Male | 18 | 3 | 31 | |
Female | 17 | 5 | 38 | |
Not indicated | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Exposure to NM education before residency | 13 | 1 | 23 | 0.342‡ |
Completed or ongoing work on PhD thesis | 16 | 7 | 40 | 0.409‡ |
Interest in scientific research | 0.135† | |||
Low | 6 | 2 | 11 | |
Mid | 16 | 0 | 27 | |
High | 10 | 6 | 18 | |
Not indicated | 3 | 1 | 14 | |
Clinical working experience before residency | 27 | 5 | 38 | 0.777‡ |
Inspired by someone to choose subspecialty | NA | 3 | 32 | 0.728‡ |
Attractive circumstances for NM subspecialty | 9 | 5 | 28 | 0.595‡ |
Unattractive NM subspecialty circumstances | 4 | 2 | 19 | 0.931‡ |
Influence of attractive or unattractive circumstances | NA | 3 | 6 | 0.100‡ |
Influence of future employment chances | NA | 4 | 13 | 0.178‡ |
Preference of future working place | 0.361‡ | |||
Academic | 11 | 3 | 29 | |
Nonacademic | 19 | 3 | 30 | |
Elsewhere | 5 | 3 | 10 | |
No choice | 0 | 0 | 1 |
*Differences between NM and radiology residents.
↵†According to Mann–Whitney test.
↵‡According to χ2 test.
NM = nuclear medicine; NA = not applicable.
Of the 9 NM residents, 7 had already started NM training and 2 had decided to choose it. Of the 70 radiology residents, 47 had already started radiology training and 23 had decided to choose it.