TABLE 6

Diagnostic Testing Terms

TermDefinitionExample
FPRProportion of incorrect positive results among those without diseaseFPR of SLNB in T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinomas was 29.3% (26)
Specificity (1 − FPR)Probability of negative results among those without disease (true-negative rate)Specificity of SLNB in T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinomas was 70.7% (26)
FNRProportion of incorrect negative results among those with diseaseFNR of SLNB in T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinomas was 9.8% (26)
Sensitivity (1 − FNR)Probability of positive results among those with disease (true-positive rate)Sensitivity of SLNB in T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinomas was 90.2% (26)
NPVProbability of not having disease given that test result was negativeNPV in NRG-HN002 for 2-y locoregional control of head and neck was 94.5% (24)
PPVProbability of having disease given that test result was positiveFor skull base lesions, PPV was 80%, 60%, and 68.4% and NPV 100%, 83.3%, and 75% for radiologist’s interpretation, SUV cutoff of 2.5, and SUV cutoff of 3.0, respectively (27)
ROC curvePlot of diagnostic tests’ 1 − specificity by sensitivity for different thresholdsHyun et al. (32)
AUCMeasure of how well classifier can differentiate between 2 diagnostic groupsAUC of 0.71 when predicting 1-y overall survival from changes in 18F-FDG uptake after therapy for Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (32)
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT; SUV = standardized uptake value.