RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 FAPI-74 PET/CT Using Either 18F-AlF or Cold-kit 68Ga-labeling: Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry and Tumor Delineation in Lung Cancer Patients JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP jnumed.120.245084 DO 10.2967/jnumed.120.245084 A1 Frederik Giesel A1 Sebastian Adeberg A1 Mustafa Syed A1 Thomas Lindner A1 Luis David Jimenez A1 Eleni Mavriopoulou A1 Fabian Staudinger A1 Eric Tonndorf-Martini A1 Sebastian Regnery A1 Stefan Rieken A1 Rami ElShafie A1 Manuel Röhrich A1 Paul Flechsig A1 Andreas Kluge A1 Annette Altmann A1 Juergen Debus A1 Uwe A. Haberkorn A1 Clemens Kratochwil YR 2020 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2020/09/18/jnumed.120.245084.abstract AB 68Ga-FAPI-2/4/46 have already been proposed as promising PET-tracers. However, the short half-life of 68Ga (T1/2 68 min) creates problems with manufacture and delivery. 18F (T1/2 110 min) labeling would result in a more practical large scale production and a cold-kit formulation would improve the spontaneous availability. The NOTA-chelator ligand FAPI-74 can be labeled with both 18F-AlF (Aluminum-Fluoride) and 68Ga. Here we describe the in-vivo evaluation of 18F-FAPI-74 and a proof-of-mechanism of 68Ga-FAPI-74 labeled at ambient temperature. Methods: In ten patients with lung cancer PET-scans were acquired at 10 min, 1h and 3H after administration of 259±26 MBq 18F-FAPI-74. Physiological biodistribution and tumor uptake were semi-quantitatively evaluated based on SUV at each time-point. Absorbed doses were evaluated using OLINDA/EXM 1.1 and QDOSE dosimetry software with the dose calculator IDAC-Dose 2.1. Identical methods were used to evaluate one exam after injection of 263 MBq 68Ga-FAPI-74. Results: The highest contrast was achieved 1 h p.i. in primary tumors, lymph node and distant metastases with SUVmax >10, respectively. The effective dose per 100 MBq administered activity of 18F-FAPI-74 was 1.4±0.2 mSv and for 68Ga-FAPI-74 it was 1.6 mSv. Thus, the radiation burden of a diagnostic 18F-FAPI-74 PET-scan is even lower than that of PET-scans with 18F-FDG and other 18F-tracers; 68Ga-FAPI-74 is comparable to other 68Ga-ligands. FAPI-PET/CT supported target volume definition for guiding radiotherapy. Conclusion: High contrast and low radiation burden of FAPI-74 PET/CT favors multiple clinical applications. Centralized large-scale production of 18F-FAPI-74 or decentralized cold-kit labeling of 68Ga-FAPI-74 allows flexible routine use.