RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Consensus Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Lung Disease JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP 1701 OP 1707 DO 10.2967/jnumed.120.244780 VO 61 IS 12 A1 Chen, Delphine L. A1 Ballout, Safia A1 Chen, Laigao A1 Cheriyan, Joseph A1 Choudhury, Gourab A1 Denis-Bacelar, Ana M. A1 Emond, Elise A1 Erlandsson, Kjell A1 Fisk, Marie A1 Fraioli, Francesco A1 Groves, Ashley M. A1 Gunn, Roger N. A1 Hatazawa, Jun A1 Holman, Beverley F. A1 Hutton, Brian F. A1 Iida, Hidehiro A1 Lee, Sarah A1 MacNee, William A1 Matsunaga, Keiko A1 Mohan, Divya A1 Parr, David A1 Rashidnasab, Alaleh A1 Rizzo, Gaia A1 Subramanian, Deepak A1 Tal-Singer, Ruth A1 Thielemans, Kris A1 Tregay, Nicola A1 van Beek, Edwin J.R. A1 Vass, Laurence A1 Vidal Melo, Marcos F. A1 Wellen, Jeremy W. A1 Wilkinson, Ian A1 Wilson, Frederick J. A1 Winkler, Tilo YR 2020 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/61/12/1701.abstract AB PET with 18F-FDG has been increasingly applied, predominantly in the research setting, to study drug effects and pulmonary biology and to monitor disease progression and treatment outcomes in lung diseases that interfere with gas exchange through alterations of the pulmonary parenchyma, airways, or vasculature. To date, however, there are no widely accepted standard acquisition protocols or imaging data analysis methods for pulmonary 18F-FDG PET/CT in these diseases, resulting in disparate approaches. Hence, comparison of data across the literature is challenging. To help harmonize the acquisition and analysis and promote reproducibility, we collated details of acquisition protocols and analysis methods from 7 PET centers. From this information and our discussions, we reached the consensus recommendations given here on patient preparation, choice of dynamic versus static imaging, image reconstruction, and image analysis reporting.