RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for Baseline Evaluation of Patients with Head and Neck Paraganglioma JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP jnumed.112.115485 DO 10.2967/jnumed.112.115485 A1 Sharma, Punit A1 Thakar, Alok A1 Suman KC, Sudhir A1 Dhull, Varun Singh A1 Singh, Harmandeep A1 Naswa, Niraj A1 Reddy, Rama Mohan A1 Karunanithi, Sellam A1 Kumar, Rajeev A1 Kumar, Rakesh A1 Malhotra, Arun A1 Bal, Chandrasekhar YR 2013 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2013/03/20/jnumed.112.115485.abstract AB The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of 68Ga-labeled DOTANOC PET/CT for baseline evaluation of patients with head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs). Methods: The data for 26 patients (mean age ± SD, 34.3 ± 10.4 y; 50% men) with known or suspected HNPs who underwent 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for staging were retrospectively analyzed. PET/CT was performed after intravenous injection of 132–222 MBq of 68Ga-DOTANOC. The images were evaluated by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians in consensus, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The PET/CT findings were grouped as HNPs, paraganglioma at other sites (non-HNPs), and metastatic disease. The size and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured for all lesions. All of the patients also underwent whole-body 131I-metaiodobenzylgunanidine (131I-MIBG) scintigraphy and conventional imaging (CT/MR imaging) of the head and neck region. Their results were compared with those of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Results: 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT findings were positive in all 26 patients, and 78 lesions were detected. PET/CT imaging demonstrated 45 HNPS, 10 non-HNPs, and 23 metastatic sites. Fifteen patients (57.6%) had more than one site of disease on PET/CT. Among 45 HNPs, 26 were carotid body tumors (CBTs), 15 glomus jugulare, 3 glomus tympanicum, and 1 laryngeal paraganglioma. A positive correlation was seen between size and SUVmax of HNPs (ρ = 0.323; P = 0.030). The SUVmax of the CBTs was higher than that of jugulotympanic paragangliomas (P = 0.026). No correlation was seen between size and SUVmax (ρ = 0.069; P = 0.854) of non-HNPs. The size and SUVmax of non-HNPs were significantly less than those of HNPs (P = 0.029 and 0.047, respectively). 131I-MIBG scintigraphy showed only 30 of the 78 lesions and was inferior to PET/CT (P < 0.0001). Conventional imaging (CT/MR imaging) was positive for 42 of 49 head and neck lesions and was inferior to PET/CT on direct comparison (P = 0.015). A combination of CT/MR imaging and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy detected only 53 of 78 (67.9%) lesions and was also inferior to PET/CT (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT is useful for the baseline evaluation of patients with HNPs and can demonstrate synchronous paragangliomas at other sites and distant metastases. It is superior to 131I-MIBG scintigraphy and conventional imaging (CT/MR imaging) for this purpose.