RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Evaluation of Optimal Acquisition Duration or Injected Activity for Pediatric 18F-FDG PET/CT JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP 1028 OP 1034 DO 10.2967/jnumed.110.086579 VO 52 IS 7 A1 Alessio, Adam M. A1 Sammer, Marla A1 Phillips, Grace S. A1 Manchanda, Vivek A1 Mohr, Brandt C. A1 Parisi, Marguerite T. YR 2011 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/52/7/1028.abstract AB Pediatric 18F-FDG dosing and acquisition durations are generally based on coarse extrapolation from adult guidelines. This study sought to determine whether shorter acquisition durations or a lower 18F-FDG injected activity could be used for pediatric 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations while maintaining diagnostic utility. Reduction of overall scan time potentially reduces motion artifacts, improves patient comfort, and decreases length of sedation. Alternatively, decreased 18F-FDG dose minimizes radiation risk. Methods: Fourteen whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations were performed on 13 patients (weight, 13–109 kg; age range, 1–23 y) with a weight-based injected activity (5.3 MBq/kg [0.144 mCi/kg]), fixed acquisition durations (3 min/field of view [FOV] if < 22 kg, 5 min/FOV if > 22 kg), and list-mode acquisition. For each examination, the list-mode data were truncated to form multiple datasets with shorter acquisition durations down to a minimum of 1 min/FOV (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min/FOV data were formed from single 5 min/FOV acquisition). Fifty-six image volumes were generated, randomized, and reviewed in a masked manner with corresponding CT image volumes by 5 radiologists. Overall, subjective adequacy and objective lesion detection accuracy by body region were evaluated. Results: All examinations with maximum acquisition duration were graded as adequate and were used as the reference standard for detection accuracy. For patients less than 22 kg, 1 of the 3 PET/CT examinations was graded as inadequate for clinical tasks when acquisition duration was reduced to 2 min/FOV, and all examinations were graded as inadequate when reduced to 1 min/FOV. For patients more than 22 kg, all 3–5 min/FOV studies were graded as adequate, and 2 of the 9 studies were graded as inadequate for 2 min/FOV studies. Lesion detection accuracy was perfect for acquisition times between 3 min/FOV and 5 min/FOV for all regions of the body. However, lesion detection became less accurate when imaging acquisition time was reduced more than 40%. Conclusion: Evaluation of image volumes generated from simulated shorter acquisition durations suggests that imaging times for larger patients (>22 kg) can be reduced from 5 min/FOV to 3 min/FOV without a loss of diagnostic utility. Using decreased acquisition times as a surrogate for 18F-FDG dose, 18F-FDG dose can be reduced by approximately 40% when all patients were scanned for 5 min/FOV.