TY - JOUR T1 - Joint Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation in Time-of-Flight PET: A Quantitative Analysis JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO - J Nucl Med SP - 1630 LP - 1635 DO - 10.2967/jnumed.117.204156 VL - 59 IS - 10 AU - Ahmadreza Rezaei AU - Christophe M. Deroose AU - Thomas Vahle AU - Fernando Boada AU - Johan Nuyts Y1 - 2018/10/01 UR - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/10/1630.abstract N2 - Methods for joint activity reconstruction and attenuation reconstruction of time-of-flight (TOF) PET data provide an effective solution to attenuation correction when no (or incomplete or inaccurate) information on attenuation is available. One of the main barriers limiting use of these methods in clinical practice is their lack of validation in a relatively large patient database. In this contribution, we aim to validate reconstruction performed with maximum-likelihood activity reconstruction and attenuation registration (MLRR) in a whole-body patient dataset. Furthermore, a partial validation (because the scale problem of the algorithm is avoided for now) of reconstruction performed with maximum-likelihood activity and attenuation (MLAA) is also provided. We present a quantitative comparison between these 2 methods of joint reconstruction and the current clinical gold standard, maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) with CT-based attenuation correction. Methods: The whole-body TOF PET emission data of each patient dataset were processed as a whole to reconstruct an activity volume covering all the acquired bed positions, helping reduce the problem of a scale per bed position in MLAA to a global scale for the entire activity volume. Three reconstruction algorithms were used: MLEM, MLRR, and MLAA. A maximum-likelihood scaling of the single-scatter simulation estimate to the emission data was used for scatter correction. The reconstruction results for various regions of interest were then analyzed. Results: The joint reconstructions of the whole-body patient dataset provided better quantification than the gold standard in cases of PET and CT misalignment caused by patient or organ motion. Our quantitative analysis showed a difference of −4.2% ± 2.3% between MLRR and MLEM and a difference of −7.5% ± 4.6% between MLAA and MLEM, averaged over all regions of interest. Conclusion: Joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation provides a useful means to estimate tracer distribution when CT-based-attenuation images are subject to misalignment or are not available. With an accurate estimate of the scatter contribution in the emission measurements, the joint reconstructions of TOF PET data are within clinically acceptable accuracy. ER -