PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Guillaume P. Nicolas AU - Seval Beykan AU - Hakim Bouterfa AU - Jens Kaufmann AU - Andreas Bauman AU - Michael Lassmann AU - Jean Claude Reubi AU - Jean E.F. Rivier AU - Helmut R. Maecke AU - Melpomeni Fani AU - Damian Wild TI - Safety, Biodistribution, and Radiation Dosimetry of <sup>68</sup>Ga-OPS202 in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Phase I Imaging Study AID - 10.2967/jnumed.117.199737 DP - 2018 Jun 01 TA - Journal of Nuclear Medicine PG - 909--914 VI - 59 IP - 6 4099 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/6/909.short 4100 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/6/909.full SO - J Nucl Med2018 Jun 01; 59 AB - Preclinical and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that radiolabeled somatostatin (sst) receptor antagonists perform better than agonists in detecting neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We performed a prospective phase I/II study to evaluate the sst receptor antagonist 68Ga-OPS202 (68Ga-NODAGA-JR11; NODAGA = 1,4,7-triazacyclononane,1-glutaric acid-4,7-acetic acid and JR11 = Cpa-c(dCys-Aph(Hor)-dAph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-dTyr-NH2)) for PET imaging. Here, we report the results of phase I of the study. Methods: Patients received 2 single 150-MBq intravenous injections of 68Ga-OPS202 3–4 wk apart (15 μg of peptide at visit 1 and 50 μg at visit 2). At visit 1, a dynamic PET/CT scan over the kidney was obtained during the first 30 min after injection, and static whole-body scans were obtained at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h after injection; at visit 2, a static whole-body scan was obtained at 1 h. Blood samples and urine were collected at regular intervals to determine 68Ga-OPS202 pharmacokinetics. Safety, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and the most appropriate imaging time point for 68Ga-OPS202 were assessed. Results: Twelve patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs took part in the study. 68Ga-OPS202 cleared rapidly from the blood, with a mean residence time of 2.4 ± 1.1 min/L. The organs with the highest mean dose coefficients were the urinary bladder wall, kidneys, and spleen. The calculated effective dose was 2.4E−02 ± 0.2E−02 mSv/MBq, corresponding to 3.6 mSv, for a reference activity of 150 MBq. Based on total numbers of detected malignant lesions, the optimal time window for the scan was between 1 and 2 h. For malignant liver lesions, the time point at which most patients had the highest mean tumor contrast was 1 h. 68Ga-OPS202 was well tolerated; adverse events were grade 1 or 2, and there were no signals of concern from laboratory blood or urinalysis tests. Conclusion: 68Ga-OPS202 showed favorable biodistribution and imaging properties, with optimal tumor contrast between 1 and 2 h after injection. Dosimetry analysis revealed that the dose delivered by 68Ga-OPS202 to organs is similar to that delivered by other 68Ga-labeled sst analogs. Further evaluation of 68Ga-OPS202 for PET/CT imaging of NETs is therefore warranted.