RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 124I PET/CT to Predict the Outcome of Blind 131I Treatment in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Diagnostic Cohort Study (THYROPET) JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP 701 OP 707 DO 10.2967/jnumed.115.168138 VO 57 IS 5 A1 Jakob W. Kist A1 Bart de Keizer A1 Manfred van der Vlies A1 Adrienne H. Brouwers A1 Dyde A. Huysmans A1 Friso M. van der Zant A1 Rick Hermsen A1 Marcel P.M. Stokkel A1 Otto S. Hoekstra A1 Wouter V. Vogel YR 2016 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/57/5/701.abstract AB Patients with suspected recurrence from differentiated thyroid carcinoma, based on an increased thyroglobulin (Tg) level and negative neck ultrasound (US), pose a clinical dilemma. Because standard imaging has a low yield identifying potential recurrence, blind 131I treatment is often applied. However, a tumor-negative 131I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) prevails in 38%–50% of patients. We performed a prospective multicenter observational cohort study to test the hypothesis that 124I PET/CT can identify the patients with a tumor-negative posttherapy 131I WBS. Methods: Our study was designed to include 100 patients with detectable Tg and a negative neck US, who were planned for blind 131I therapy. All patients underwent 124I PET/CT after administration of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone. Subsequently, after 4–6 wk of thyroid hormone withdrawal patients were treated with 5.5–7.4 GBq of 131I, followed by WBS a week later. The primary endpoint was the number of 131I therapies that could have been omitted using the predicted outcome of the 124I PET/CT, operationalized as the concordance of tumor detection by 124I PET/CT, using post-131I therapy WBS as the reference test. The study would be terminated if 3 patients had a negative 124I PET/CT and a positive posttherapy 131I scan. Results: After inclusion of 17 patients, we terminated the study preliminarily because the stopping rule had been met. Median Tg level at 131I therapy was 28 μg/L (interquartile range, 129). Eight posttherapy WBS were negative (47%), all of which were correctly predicted by negative 124I PET/CT. Nine posttherapy WBS showed iodine-avid tumor, of which 4 also had positive 124I PET/CT findings. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 124I PET/CT were 44% (confidence interval [CI], 14%–79%), 100% (CI, 63%–100%), 62% (CI, 32%–86%), and 100% (CI, 40%–100%), respectively. Implementation of 124I PET in this setting would have led to 47% (8/17) less futile 131I treatments, but 29% of patients (5/17) would have been denied potentially effective therapy. Conclusion: In patients with biochemical evidence of recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma and a tumor-negative neck US, the high false-negative rate of 124I PET/CT after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone 124I PET/CT as implemented in this study precludes its use as a scouting procedure to prevent futile blind 131I therapy.