RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Evaluating Treatment Response of Radioembolization in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Using 18F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP 1661 OP 1666 DO 10.2967/jnumed.115.158758 VO 56 IS 11 A1 Hartenbach, Markus A1 Weber, Stefan A1 Albert, Nathalie L. A1 Hartenbach, Sabrina A1 Hirtl, Albert A1 Zacherl, Mathias J. A1 Paprottka, Philipp M. A1 Tiling, Reinhold A1 Bartenstein, Peter A1 Hacker, Marcus A1 Haug, Alexander R. YR 2015 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/56/11/1661.abstract AB The aim of this study was to evaluate 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT as a metabolic imaging technique for the assessment of treatment response to 90Y radioembolization in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Thirty-four HCC patients undergoing 78 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scans were identified for this study. Patients with initial or follow-up metastastic disease (n = 9) were excluded at the time point of the metastatic occurrence as well as patients with negative α-fetoprotein (AFP; n = 1), resulting in 24 patients and 57 scans that were eligible. All patients were scheduled for radioembolization and underwent 1 pretherapeutic and at least 1 posttherapeutic 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scan. Volume-of-interest analysis and volume-of-interest subtractions were performed. Maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake value (SUV) analysis was performed, and the total intrahepatic 18F-fluoroethylcholine positive tumor volume (FEC-PTV) and tumor-to-background ratio were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using a decreasing AFP of at least 20% as a standard of reference for therapy response including receiver-operating-characteristic analyses as well as descriptive and correlation analyses and multiple logistic regression. Results: Fourteen follow-up examinations were categorized as responder and 19 follow-up examinations as nonresponder. Absolute AFP values did not correlate with SUV parameters (P = 0.055). In receiver-operating-characteristic analyses, the initial mean SUV, Δmaximum SUV, and Δtumor-to-background ratio demonstrated the highest area under the curve, 0.84 (P = 0.009), 0.83 (P = 0.011), and 0.83 (P = 0.012), respectively, resulting in a positive prediction of 82%, 83%, and 91% at the respective cutoff points. When multiple logistic regression analysis was applied, this resulted in an area under the curve of 0.90 (P = 0.001), with a positive prediction of 94% and a sensitivity of 94%. The FEC-PTV did not reach significance in the presented dataset. Conclusion: 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT demonstrates a high potential for follow-up assessment in the context of radioembolization in patients with locally advanced, but nonmetastatic, HCC and initially elevated AFP, possibly enabling early therapy monitoring independent of morphology.