RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Masses: A Pilot Study JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO J Nucl Med FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP 255 OP 260 DO 10.2967/jnumed.114.147744 VO 56 IS 2 A1 Felix Nensa A1 Ercan Tezgah A1 Thorsten D. Poeppel A1 Christoph J. Jensen A1 Juliane Schelhorn A1 Jens Köhler A1 Philipp Heusch A1 Oliver Bruder A1 Thomas Schlosser A1 Kai Nassenstein YR 2015 UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/56/2/255.abstract AB The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging could improve the diagnostic workup in patients with cardiac masses. Methods: Twenty patients were prospectively assessed using integrated cardiac 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging: 16 patients with cardiac masses of unknown identity and 4 patients with cardiac sarcoma after surgical therapy. All scans were obtained on an integrated 3-T PET/MR device. The MR protocol consisted of half Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence, cine, and T2-weighted images as well as T1-weighted images before and after injection of gadobutrol. PET data were acquired simultaneously with the MR scan after injection of 199 ± 58 MBq of 18F-FDG. Patients were prepared with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet in a period of 24 h before the examination, and 50 IU/kg of unfractionated heparin were administered intravenously 15 min before 18F-FDG injection. Results: Cardiac masses were diagnosed as follows: metastases, 3; direct tumor infiltration via pulmonary vein, 1; local relapse of primary sarcoma after surgery, 2; Burkitt lymphoma, 1; scar/patch tissue after surgery of primary sarcoma, 2; myxoma, 4; fibroelastoma, 1; caseous calcification of mitral annulus, 3; and thrombus, 3. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in malignant lesions was significantly higher than in nonmalignant cases (13.2 ± 6.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.0004). When a threshold of 5.2 or greater was used, SUVmax was found to yield 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the differentiation between malignant and nonmalignant cases. T2-weighted hyperintensity and contrast enhancement both yielded 100% sensitivity but a weak specificity of 54% and 46%, respectively. Morphologic tumor features as assessed by cine MR imaging yielded 86% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Consent interpretation using all available MR features yielded 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. A Boolean ‘AND’ combination of an SUVmax of 5.2 or greater with consent MR image interpretation improved sensitivity and specificity to 100%. Conclusion: In selected patients, 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging can improve the noninvasive diagnosis and follow-up of cardiac masses.