TY - JOUR T1 - The Efficacy of Hepatic <sup>90</sup>Y Resin Radioembolization for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Meta-Analysis JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO - J Nucl Med SP - 1404 LP - 1410 DO - 10.2967/jnumed.113.135855 VL - 55 IS - 9 AU - Zlatko Devcic AU - Jarrett Rosenberg AU - Arthur J.A. Braat AU - Tust Techasith AU - Arjun Banerjee AU - Daniel Y. Sze AU - Marnix G.E.H. Lam Y1 - 2014/09/01 UR - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/55/9/1404.abstract N2 - 90Y resin radioembolization is an emerging treatment in patients with liver-dominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs), despite the absence of level I data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this modality in a meta-analysis of the published literature. Methods: A comprehensive review protocol screened all reports in the literature. Strict selection criteria were applied to ensure consistency among the selected studies: human subjects, complete response data with time interval, resin microspheres, more than 5 patients, not a duplicate cohort, English language, and separate and complete data for resin-based 90Y treatment of mNET if the study included multiple tumor and microsphere types. Selected studies were critically appraised on 50 study criteria, in accordance with the research reporting standards for radioembolization. Response data (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were extracted and analyzed using both fixed and random-effects meta-analyses. Results: One hundred fifty-six studies were screened; 12 were selected, totaling 435 procedures for response assessment. Funnel plots showed no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.841). Critical appraisal revealed a median of 75% of desired criteria included in selected studies. Very high between-study heterogeneity ruled out a fixed-effects model. The random-effects weighted average objective response rate (complete and partial responses, CR and PR, respectively) was 50% (95% confidence interval, 38%–62%), and weighted average disease control rate (CR, PR, and stable disease) was 86% (95% confidence interval, 78%–92%). The percentage of patients with pancreatic mNET was marginally associated with poorer response (P = 0.030), accounting for approximately 23% of the heterogeneity among studies. The percentage of CR and PR correlated with median survival (R = 0.85; P = 0.008). Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms radioembolization to be an effective treatment option for patients with hepatic mNET. The pooled data demonstrated a high response rate and improved survival for patients responding to therapy. ER -