RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reduction in Occupational and Patient Radiation Exposure from Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Impact of Stress-Only Imaging and High-Efficiency SPECT Camera Technology
JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JO J Nucl Med
FD Society of Nuclear Medicine
SP 1251
OP 1257
DO 10.2967/jnumed.112.112680
VO 54
IS 8
A1 W. Lane Duvall
A1 Krista A. Guma
A1 Jacob Kamen
A1 Lori B. Croft
A1 Michael Parides
A1 Titus George
A1 Milena J. Henzlova
YR 2013
UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/54/8/1251.abstract
AB Recently introduced high-efficiency SPECT cameras have demonstrated the ability to reduce radiation exposure to patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging studies, especially when combined with stress-only imaging protocols. To date there have been no relevant studies examining the reduced occupational radiation exposure to medical staff. We sought to determine whether changes in stress myocardial perfusion imaging protocols and camera technology can reduce the occupational radiation exposure to the staff of a nuclear cardiology laboratory. Methods: Monthly radiation dosimeter readings from 4 nuclear technologists, 4 nurses, and 2 administrative employees were analyzed from two 12-mo periods: October 2007–September 2008 (period 1), before the use of high-efficiency SPECT, and October 2010–September 2011 (period 2), after high-efficiency SPECT was introduced. The average monthly dose equivalent in millirems (1 mrem = 0.01 mSv) was recorded from personal dosimeters worn on laboratory coats. The total activity of 99mTc used per month, mean 99mTc administered activity per patient, average number of patients per month, patient time spent in the laboratory, and proportion of stress-only studies were determined. Results: There were 3,539 patients in period 1 and 3,898 in period 2. An approximately 40% reduction in the dose equivalent across all staff members occurred during this time (−16.9 and −16.2 mrem for nuclear technologists and nurses, respectively; P < 0.0001). During period 2, the total activity of 99mTc used per month decreased (10,746 vs. 7,174 mCi [1 mCi = 37 MBq], P < 0.0001), as did the mean 99mTc administered activity per patient (36.5 vs. 23.8 mCi, P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients having stress-only imaging increased (35% vs. 56%, P < 0.0001), and the total patient time spent in the laboratory decreased. Radiation dose equivalent levels were reduced in period 2 to 1%–7% of the allowed annual occupational dose equivalent. The combination of the use of high-efficiency SPECT technology and stress-only protocols resulted in a 34.7% reduction in mean total 99mTc administered activity between time periods, with camera technology being responsible for 39.2% of the reduction and stress-only protocols for 60.8%. Conclusion: A combination of high-efficiency SPECT technology and selective use of stress-only protocols significantly reduces the occupational radiation dose equivalent to the staff of a nuclear cardiology laboratory.