TY - JOUR T1 - Engineering and Performance (NEMA and Animal) of a Lower-Cost Higher-Resolution Animal PET/CT Scanner Using Photomultiplier-Quadrant-Sharing Detectors JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO - J Nucl Med SP - 1786 LP - 1793 DO - 10.2967/jnumed.112.103507 VL - 53 IS - 11 AU - Wai-Hoi Wong AU - Hongdi Li AU - Hossain Baghaei AU - Yuxuan Zhang AU - Rocio A. Ramirez AU - Shitao Liu AU - Chao Wang AU - Shaohui An Y1 - 2012/11/01 UR - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/53/11/1786.abstract N2 - The dedicated murine PET (MuPET) scanner is a high-resolution, high-sensitivity, and low-cost preclinical PET camera designed and manufactured at our laboratory. In this article, we report its performance according to the NU 4-2008 standards of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). We also report the results of additional phantom and mouse studies. Methods: The MuPET scanner, which is integrated with a CT camera, is based on the photomultiplier-quadrant-sharing concept and comprises 180 blocks of 13 × 13 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate crystals (1.24 × 1.4 × 9.5 mm3) and 210 low-cost 19-mm photomultipliers. The camera has 78 detector rings, with an 11.6-cm axial field of view and a ring diameter of 16.6 cm. We measured the energy resolution, scatter fraction, sensitivity, spatial resolution, and counting rate performance of the scanner. In addition, we scanned the NEMA image-quality phantom, Micro Deluxe and Ultra-Micro Hot Spot phantoms, and 2 healthy mice. Results: The system average energy resolution was 14% at 511 keV. The average spatial resolution at the center of the field of view was about 1.2 mm, improving to 0.8 mm and remaining below 1.2 mm in the central 6-cm field of view when a resolution-recovery method was used. The absolute sensitivity of the camera was 6.38% for an energy window of 350–650 keV and a coincidence timing window of 3.4 ns. The system scatter fraction was 11.9% for the NEMA mouselike phantom and 28% for the ratlike phantom. The maximum noise-equivalent counting rate was 1,100 at 57 MBq for the mouselike phantom and 352 kcps at 65 MBq for the ratlike phantom. The 1-mm fillable rod was clearly observable using the NEMA image-quality phantom. The images of the Ultra-Micro Hot Spot phantom also showed the 1-mm hot rods. In the mouse studies, both the left and right ventricle walls were clearly observable, as were the Harderian glands. Conclusion: The MuPET camera has excellent resolution, sensitivity, counting rate, and imaging performance. The data show it is a powerful scanner for preclinical animal study and pharmaceutical development. ER -