TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of 3 Methods of Automated Internal Carotid Segmentation in Human Brain PET Studies: Application to the Estimation of Arterial Input Function JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO - J Nucl Med SP - 461 LP - 467 DO - 10.2967/jnumed.108.059642 VL - 50 IS - 3 AU - Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara AU - Renaud Maroy AU - Claude Comtat AU - Sebastien Jan AU - Véronique Gaura AU - Avner Bar-Hen AU - Maria-Joao Ribeiro AU - Régine Trébossen Y1 - 2009/03/01 UR - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/50/3/461.abstract N2 - Quantitative brain 18F-FDG PET studies often require the plasma time–activity curve (input function) for estimation of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc). The gold standard for input function measurement is arterial blood sampling, which is invasive and time-consuming. Alternatively, input function can be estimated from dynamic images. This estimation often implies the use of manually placed regions of interest (ROIs) over cerebral vasculature, which is an operator-dependent and time-consuming task. The aim of our study was to compare 3 algorithms of image segmentation (local means analysis [LMA], soft-decision similar component analysis [SCA], and k-means) to automatically segment internal carotid arteries from dynamic 18F-FDG brain studies. Methods: The accuracy of automatic carotid segmentation algorithms was first tested using numeric phantoms of the human brain, by quantitatively assessing the overlap between the segmented carotids and the reference regions in the phantom. Then, the algorithm that yielded the best results was applied to data from 4 healthy volunteers, who underwent an 18F-FDG dynamic 3-dimensional PET brain study. Concordance between manual and automatic ROIs, both uncorrected and after partial-volume effect and spillover correction, was first assessed. Linear regression was then used to compare manual versus automatic CMRglc values obtained using Patlak analysis. CMRglc values obtained by arterial sampling were used as a reference. Results: In phantom studies, LMA was shown to be superior to the other segmentation algorithms. By visual inspection, volunteers' internal carotids segmented by LMA were anatomically relevant. No significant difference was found between ROI values obtained by manual and automatic segmentation, either uncorrected or corrected for partial-volume effect. Linear regression demonstrated excellent agreement between the manual and automatic image-derived CMRglc values (P < 0.0001), and both correlated well with the reference values obtained by plasma samples. Conclusion: The LMA segmentation algorithm allows accurate automatic delineation of internal carotids from dynamic PET brain studies. After correction for partial-volume effect, the main application would be the estimation of an image-derived input function. ER -