@article {Rajendran837, author = {Joseph G. Rajendran and Ajay K. Gopal and Darrel R. Fisher and Larry D. Durack and Ted A. Gooley and Oliver W. Press}, title = {Myeloablative 131I-Tositumomab Radioimmunotherapy in Treating Non-Hodgkin{\textquoteright}s Lymphoma: Comparison of Dosimetry Based on Whole-Body Retention and Dose to Critical Organ Receiving the Highest Dose}, volume = {49}, number = {5}, pages = {837--844}, year = {2008}, doi = {10.2967/jnumed.107.043190}, publisher = {Society of Nuclear Medicine}, abstract = {Myeloablative radioimmunotherapy using 131I-tositumomab (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibodies is an effective therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin{\textquoteright}s lymphoma. The amount of radioactivity for radioimmunotherapy may be determined by several methods, including those based on whole-body retention and on dose to a limiting normal organ. The goal of each approach is to deliver maximal myeloablative amounts of radioactivity within the tolerance of critical normal organs. Methods: Records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent biodistribution and dosimetry evaluation after tracer infusion of 131I-tositumomab before radioimmunotherapy were reviewed. We assessed organ and tissue activities over time by serial γ-camera imaging to calculate radiation-absorbed doses. Organ volumes were determined from CT scans for organ-specific dosimetry. These dose estimates helped us to determine therapy on the basis of projected dose to the critical normal organ receiving a maximum tolerable radiation dose. We compared organ-specific dosimetry for treatment planning with the whole-body dose-assessment method by retrospectively analyzing the differences in projected organ-absorbed doses and their ratios. Results: Mean organ doses per unit of administered activity (mGy/MBq) estimated by both methods were 0.33 for liver and 0.33 for lungs by the whole-body method and 1.52 for liver and 1.74 for lungs by the organ-specific method (P = 0.0001). The median differences between methods were 0.92 mGy/MBq (range, 0.36{\textendash}2.2 mGy/MBq) for lungs, 0.82 mGy/MBq (range, 0.28{\textendash}1.67 mGy/MBq) for liver, and -0.01 mGy/MBq (range, -0.18{\textendash}0.16 mGy/MBq) for whole body. The median ratios of the treatment activities based on limiting normal-organ dose were 5.12 (range, 2.33{\textendash}10.01) for lungs, 4.14 (range, 2.16{\textendash}6.67) for liver, and 0.94 (range, 0.79{\textendash}1.22) for whole body. We found substantial differences between the dose estimated by the 2 methods for liver and lungs (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Dosimetry based on whole-body retention will underestimate the organ doses, and a preferable approach is to evaluate organ-specific doses by accounting for actual radionuclide biodistribution. Myeloablative treatments based on the latter approach allow administration of the maximum amount of radioactivity while minimizing toxicity.}, issn = {0161-5505}, URL = {https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/49/5/837}, eprint = {https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/49/5/837.full.pdf}, journal = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine} }