PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hubertus Hautzel AU - Oliver Sander AU - Alexander Heinzel AU - Matthias Schneider AU - Hans-Wilhelm Müller TI - Assessment of Large-Vessel Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET: Introducing an ROC-Analysis–Based Cutoff Ratio AID - 10.2967/jnumed.108.051920 DP - 2008 Jul 01 TA - Journal of Nuclear Medicine PG - 1107--1113 VI - 49 IP - 7 4099 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/49/7/1107.short 4100 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/49/7/1107.full SO - J Nucl Med2008 Jul 01; 49 AB - In the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with aortic involvement, 18F-FDG PET has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool. No other imaging method is able to directly detect acute inflammation within the aortic wall. However, because GCA is a rare PET indication, the assessment of GCA with 18F-FDG PET remains difficult and highly dependent on the experience of the investigator. This study aimed to semiquantify the relationship between aortic and liver uptake and to introduce a receiver operating characteristic (ROC)–based cutoff ratio to allow investigator- and experience-independent GCA diagnosis with optimal sensitivity and specificity. Ratios of aortic wall uptake versus liver uptake were calculated in a group of GCA patients and a control group. These data were assessed in an ROC analysis, and finally, a cutoff-ratio–optimizing strategy was applied. Methods: Twenty-three patients with initially suspected GCA (18 positive for GCA criteria, 5 negative) and 36 matched controls were included. The control subjects underwent PET for oncologic diagnostics. None had intrathoracic or hepatic disease or therapy-related tracer accumulation. Additionally, physiologic liver metabolism was ensured by the presence of normal liver enzymes. After defining regions of interest over the thoracic aorta and the liver, we calculated maximal standardized uptake value ratios. Sensitivities and specificities for cutoff ratios from 0.1 to 2.5 were estimated and were ultimately used to assess an optimal cutoff ratio for separating GCA patients from controls. To further investigate the usefulness of the resulting cutoff ratio, we tested it in a second control group with changed hepatic metabolism and elevated liver enzymes. Results: ROC analysis revealed optimal selectivity for a cutoff ratio of 1.0. This ratio led to a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 95.1%, and an accuracy of 94.4%. When this aorta-to-liver ratio was applied to the control group with pathologic liver metabolism, the resulting specificity was 95.6%. Conclusion: The 18F-FDG PET region-of-interest analysis with aorta-to-liver maximal standardized uptake value ratios is a reliable, investigator-independent indicator of GCA not affected by minor inflammation-associated changes in hepatic metabolism. Our results for a cutoff ratio of 1.0 prove that 18F-FDG PET is a method of high sensitivity and specificity for GCA-related large-vessel inflammation.