TY - JOUR T1 - Validation of a Standardized Normalization Template for Statistical Parametric Mapping Analysis of <sup>123</sup>I-FP-CIT Images JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO - J Nucl Med SP - 1459 LP - 1467 DO - 10.2967/jnumed.106.038646 VL - 48 IS - 9 AU - Aurélie Kas AU - Pierre Payoux AU - Marie-Odile Habert AU - Zoulikha Malek AU - Yann Cointepas AU - Georges El Fakhri AU - Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud AU - Emmanuel Itti AU - Philippe Remy Y1 - 2007/09/01 UR - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/48/9/1459.abstract N2 - 123I-FP-CIT (123I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane) is a SPECT dopamine transporter (DAT) tracer that probes dopaminergic cell loss in Parkinson's disease (PD). Quantification of 123I-FP-CIT images is performed at equilibrium using a ratio (BR) of specific (striatal) to nonspecific (occipital) uptake with values obtained from regions of interest drawn manually over these structures. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) is a fully automated voxel-based statistical approach that has great potential in the context of DAT imaging. However, the accuracy of the spatial normalization provided by SPM has not been validated for 123I-FP-CIT images. Our first aim was to create an 123I-FP-CIT template that does not require the acquisition of patient-specific MRI and to validate the spatial normalization procedure. Next, we hypothesized that this customized template could be used by different SPECT centers without affecting the outcomes of imaging analyses. Methods: The spatial normalization to the customized template created with SPM (template A1) was validated using 123I-FP-CIT images obtained from 6 subjects with essential tremor (ET) with normal DAT status and 6 PD patients. Variability in BR values due to the normalization was evaluated using striatal volume of interest (VOI). To determine whether different SPECT centers could use a unique 123I-FP-CIT template, we generated 3 other 123I-FP-CIT templates using different subjects and image-processing schemes. The interchangeability of these templates was assessed using (a) putamen BR values analyzed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland–Altman graphical analysis, and (b) SPM analysis comparing the results of group comparisons—that is, ET versus PD, obtained after normalization to each of the 4 templates. Results: There was no significant difference between pre- and postnormalization striatal BR values in our study. The mean variability calculated with putamen VOI values after normalization to each template was &lt;10%, with the lowest ICC of 98%. Intergroup analyses performed with VOI and SPM approaches provided similar results independently of the template used. Conclusion: SPM normalization was accurate even in subjects with low striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake, making it a promising approach for automatic analysis of 123I-FP-CIT images using a single customized template at different centers. ER -