RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Preparation and Biological Evaluation of <sup>64</sup>Cu-CB-TE2A-sst<sub>2</sub>-ANT, a Somatostatin Antagonist for PET Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor–Positive Tumors
JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JO J Nucl Med
FD Society of Nuclear Medicine
SP 1819
OP 1827
DO 10.2967/jnumed.108.054502
VO 49
IS 11
A1 Thaddeus J. Wadas
A1 Martin Eiblmaier
A1 Alexander Zheleznyak
A1 Christopher D. Sherman
A1 Riccardo Ferdani
A1 Kexian Liang
A1 Samuel Achilefu
A1 Carolyn J. Anderson
YR 2008
UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/49/11/1819.abstract
AB Recently, the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) selective antagonist sst2-ANT was determined to have a high affinity for SSTR2. Additionally, 111In-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid-sst2-ANT showed high uptake in an SSTR2-transfected, tumor-bearing mouse model and suggested that radiolabeled SSTR2 antagonists may be superior to agonists for imaging SSTR2-positive tumors. This report describes the synthesis and evaluation of 64Cu-CB-4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane-sst2-ANT (64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT) as a PET radiopharmaceutical for the in vivo imaging of SSTR2-positive tumors. Methods: Receptor-binding studies were performed to determine the dissociation constant of the radiopharmaceutical 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT using AR42J rat pancreatic tumor cell membranes. The internalization of 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT was compared with that of the 64Cu-labeled agonist 64Cu-CB-TE2A-tyrosine3-octreotate (64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE) in AR42J cells. Both radiopharmaceuticals were also compared in vivo through biodistribution studies using healthy rats bearing AR42J tumors, and small-animal PET/CT of 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT was performed. Results: The dissociation constant value for the radiopharmaceutical was determined to be 26 ± 2.4 nM, and the maximum number of binding sites was 23,000 fmol/mg. 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT showed significantly less internalization than did 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE at time points from 15 min to 4 h. Biodistribution studies revealed that the clearance of 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT from the blood was rapid, whereas the clearance of 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT from the liver and kidneys was more modest at all time points. Tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios were determined to be better for 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT than those for 64Cu-CB-TE2A-Y3-TATE at the later time points, although liver and kidney uptake was significantly higher. Small-animal imaging using 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT revealed excellent tumor-to-background contrast at 4 h after injection, and standardized uptake values remained high even after 24 h. Conclusion: The PET radiopharmaceutical 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT is an attractive agent, worthy of future study as a PET radiopharmaceutical for the imaging of somatostatin receptor–positive tumors.