PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Alexius Y. Joe AU - Thomas Tielmann AU - Jan Bucerius AU - Michael J. Reinhardt AU - Holger Palmedo AU - Wolfgang Maier AU - Hans-Juergen Biersack AU - Astrid Zobel TI - Response-Dependent Differences in Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Changes with Citalopram in Treatment of Major Depression DP - 2006 Aug 01 TA - Journal of Nuclear Medicine PG - 1319--1325 VI - 47 IP - 8 4099 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/47/8/1319.short 4100 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/47/8/1319.full SO - J Nucl Med2006 Aug 01; 47 AB - Major depression (MD) is the most frequent psychiatric disorder with a predicted increase within the next decade. The understanding of the neurobiologic basis of its cause, antidepressive treatment effects, and identification of treatment outcome predictors is of crucial importance to warrant efficient medical care. The aim of our study was to investigate differences of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in MD between responders and nonresponders in the beginning and differences during the course of treatment. Methods: 99mTc-Labeled d,l-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime brain scans under resting conditions were performed on 65 patients with MD. All patients were treated with citalopram as an antidepressive monotherapy. SPECT scans were performed 2 times, at the beginning (t1) and after 4 wk of medication (t2). Voxel-by-voxel analyses were performed using SPM. Unpaired t test, paired t test, and multigroup analysis were used on a significance threshold of P < 0.005 (uncorrected) to identify significant differences in rCBF between responders and nonresponders at t1, within both groups over time of treatment (t2–t1), as well as a group × time interactions. Results: Thirty-five patients responded after 4 wk of treatment. Distinct differences between responders and nonresponders were found at the beginning of treatment and also relating to changes in rCBF during treatment. Responders showed a higher posterior cingulate activity at t1. Furthermore, an opposite direction of rCBF changes during treatment could be observed in this area. Conclusion: The differences in rCBF in responders and nonresponders in the posterior cingulate at t1 and the opposite directed changes in rCBF in both groups during treatment in this region suggest that the posterior cingulate function plays a key role in the pathophysiology of depression and may have a predictive value for antidepressive treatment outcome.