RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of <sup>90</sup>Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan and <sup>131</sup>I-Tositumomab in Clinical Practice
JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JO J Nucl Med
FD Society of Nuclear Medicine
SP 1767
OP 1776
DO 10.2967/jnumed.107.043489
VO 48
IS 11
A1 Heather A. Jacene
A1 Ross Filice
A1 Wayne Kasecamp
A1 Richard L. Wahl
YR 2007
UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/48/11/1767.abstract
AB We retrospectively evaluated our single-center clinical experience with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I-tositumomab for therapy of refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We evaluated the hypothesis that the patient-specific dosing regimen used with 131I-tositumomab results in less bone marrow toxicity than does the weight-based dosing regimen used with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan. Methods: Thirty-eight patients (25 male and 13 female; median age, 64 y) received radioimmunotherapy for NHL (20 received 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan; 18 received 131I-tositumomab). Patient and disease characteristics were evaluated to determine whether any were prognostic indicators of short- or long-term clinical response. The 12-wk response rate and clinical and hematologic toxicities attributable to each therapy were assessed. The response rate at 12 wk was correlated with long-term overall survival. Results: Twenty-six patients received full-radiation-dose radioimmunotherapy and 12 received attenuated doses because of hematologic concerns. The 12-wk overall response rate for all patients was 47%, and the complete response rate was 13%. The 12-wk overall response rate did not significantly differ between the 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I-tositumomab groups. Responses at 12 wk were more frequent in patients with normal levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase, no bone marrow involvement, and International Prognostic Index scores of no more than 2 (P ≤ 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 57% and 56% of patients treated with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I-tositumomab, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 57% and 50%, respectively. The time to the absolute neutrophil count nadir was shorter for the 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan group than for the 131I-tositumomab group (36 ± 9 vs. 46 ± 14 d, P = 0.01). The mean percentage decline in platelet count after radioimmunotherapy was greater in the 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan group than in the 131I-tositumomab group (79% ± 17% vs. 63% ± 28%, P = 0.04). Overall survival was longer in responders than in nonresponders 12 wk after therapy (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Both 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I-tositumomab were well tolerated. We observed response rates at the lower range of those reported in the literature, possibly because of referral bias, dose attenuation, and reasonably liberal acceptance criteria for a patient to receive therapy. Initial response assessments 12 wk after radioimmunotherapy predict longer-term response. 131I-tositumomab caused significantly less severe declines in platelet counts than did 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and may be a more appropriate choice for patients with limited bone marrow reserve, but large, randomized, prospective trials are needed to better compare the performance of these 2 treatments.