RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 PET Studies of <em>d</em>-Methamphetamine Pharmacokinetics in Primates: Comparison with <em>l</em>-Methamphetamine and (−)-Cocaine
JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JO J Nucl Med
FD Society of Nuclear Medicine
SP 1724
OP 1732
DO 10.2967/jnumed.107.040279
VO 48
IS 10
A1 Joanna S. Fowler
A1 Carsten Kroll
A1 Richard Ferrieri
A1 David Alexoff
A1 Jean Logan
A1 Stephen L. Dewey
A1 Wynne Schiffer
A1 David Schlyer
A1 Pauline Carter
A1 Payton King
A1 Colleen Shea
A1 Youwen Xu
A1 Lisa Muench
A1 Helene Benveniste
A1 Paul Vaska
A1 Nora D. Volkow
YR 2007
UL http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/48/10/1724.abstract
AB The methamphetamine molecule has a chiral center and exists as 2 enantiomers, d-methamphetamine (the more active enantiomer) and l-methamphetamine (the less active enantiomer). d-Methamphetamine is associated with more intense stimulant effects and higher abuse liability. The objective of this study was to measure the pharmacokinetics of d-methamphetamine for comparison with both l-methamphetamine and (−)-cocaine in the baboon brain and peripheral organs and to assess the saturability and pharmacologic specificity of binding. Methods: d- and l-methamphetamine and (−)-cocaine were labeled with 11C via alkylation of the norprecursors with 11C-methyl iodide using literature methods. Six different baboons were studied in 11 PET sessions at which 2 radiotracer injections were administered 2–3 h apart to determine the distribution and kinetics of 11C-d-methamphetamine in brain and peripheral organs. Saturability and pharmacologic specificity were assessed using pretreatment with d-methamphetamine, methylphenidate, and tetrabenazine. 11C-d-Methamphetamine pharmacokinetics were compared with 11C-l-methamphetamine and 11C-(−)-cocaine in both brain and peripheral organs in the same animal. Results: 11C-d- and l-methamphetamine both showed high uptake and widespread distribution in the brain. Pharmacokinetics did not differ between enantiomers, and the cerebellum peaked earlier and cleared more quickly than the striatum for both. 11C-d-Methamphetamine distribution volume ratio was not substantially affected by pretreatment with methamphetamine, methylphenidate, or tetrabenazine. Both enantiomers showed rapid, high uptake and clearance in the heart and lungs and slower uptake and clearance in the liver and kidneys. A comparison of 11C-d-methamphetamine and 11C-(−)-cocaine showed that 11C-d-methamphetamine peaked later in the brain than did 11C-(−)-cocaine and cleared more slowly. The 2 drugs showed similar behavior in all peripheral organs examined except the kidneys and pancreas, which showed higher uptake for 11C-d-methamphetamine. Conclusion: Brain pharmacokinetics did not differ between d-and l-methamphetamine and thus cannot account for the more intense stimulant effects of d-methamphetamine. Lack of pharmacologic blockade by methamphetamine indicates that the PET image represents nonspecific binding, though the fact that methamphetamine is both a transporter substrate and an inhibitor may also play a role. A comparison of 11C-d-methamphetamine and 11C-(−)-cocaine in the same animal showed that the slower clearance of methamphetamine is likely to contribute to its previously reported longer-lasting stimulant effects relative to those of (−)-cocaine. High kidney uptake of d-methamphetamine or its labeled metabolites may account for the reported renal toxicity of d-methamphetamine in humans.