TY - JOUR T1 - Imaging Proliferation in Lung Tumors with PET: <sup>18</sup>F-FLT Versus <sup>18</sup>F-FDG JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine JO - J Nucl Med SP - 1426 LP - 1431 VL - 44 IS - 9 AU - Andreas K. Buck AU - Gisela Halter AU - Holger Schirrmeister AU - Jörg Kotzerke AU - Imke Wurziger AU - Gerhard Glatting AU - Torsten Mattfeldt AU - Bernd Neumaier AU - Sven N. Reske AU - Martin Hetzel Y1 - 2003/09/01 UR - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/44/9/1426.abstract N2 - Recently, the thymidine analog 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) was suggested for imaging tumoral proliferation. In this prospective study, we examined whether 18F-FLT better determines proliferative activity in newly diagnosed lung nodules than does 18F-FDG. Methods: Twenty-six patients with pulmonary nodules on chest CT were examined with PET and the tracers 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT. Tumoral uptake was determined by calculation of standardized uptake value (SUV). Within 2 wk, patients underwent resective surgery or had core biopsy. Proliferative activity was estimated by counting nuclei stained with the Ki-67–specific monoclonal antibody MIB-1 per total number of nuclei in representative tissue specimens. The correlation between the percentage of proliferating cells and the SUVs for 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG was determined using linear regression analysis. Results: Eighteen patients had malignant tumors (13 with non–small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], 1 with small cell lung cancer, and 4 with pulmonary metastases from extrapulmonary tumors); 8 had benign lesions. In all visible lesions, mean 18F-FDG uptake was 4.1 (median, 4.4; SD, 3.0; range, 1.0–10.6), and mean 18F-FLT uptake was 1.8 (median, 1.2; SD, 2.0; range, 0.8–6.4). Statistical analysis revealed a significantly higher uptake of 18F-FDG than of 18F-FLT (Mann–Whitney U test, P &lt; 0.05). 18F-FLT SUV correlated better with proliferation index (P &lt; 0.0001; r = 0.92) than did 18F-FDG SUV (P &lt; 0.001; r = 0.59). With the exception of 1 carcinoma in situ, all malignant tumors showed increased 18F-FDG PET uptake. 18F-FLT PET was false-negative in the carcinoma in situ, in another NSCLC with a low proliferation index, and in a patient with lung metastases from colorectal cancer. Increased 18F-FLT uptake was related exclusively to malignant tumors. By contrast, 18F-FDG PET was false-positive in 4 of 8 patients with benign lesions. Conclusion: 18F-FLT uptake correlates better with proliferation of lung tumors than does uptake of 18F-FDG and might be more useful as a selective biomarker for tumor proliferation. ER -