PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nikitas, John AU - Castellanos Rieger, Angela AU - Farolfi, Andrea AU - Seyedroudbari, Ameen AU - Kishan, Amar U. AU - Nickols, Nicholas G. AU - Steinberg, Michael L. AU - Valle, Luca F. AU - Rettig, Matthew AU - Czernin, Johannes AU - Calais, Jeremie TI - Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT–Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer AID - 10.2967/jnumed.124.267922 DP - 2024 Aug 01 TA - Journal of Nuclear Medicine PG - jnumed.124.267922 4099 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2024/08/01/jnumed.124.267922.short 4100 - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2024/08/01/jnumed.124.267922.full AB - Systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) include androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapy, and radiopharmaceuticals, all of which have associated toxicity. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT allows for higher sensitivity in detecting metastatic disease than is possible with conventional imaging. We hypothesized that PSMA PET/CT–guided, metastasis-directed radiotherapy may offer durable disease control with low toxicity rates in patients with mCRPC who have a limited number of metastases. Methods: We retrospectively screened 5 prospective PSMA PET/CT studies for patients with mCRPC who had up to 5 sites of oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive disease on PSMA PET/CT and subsequently received definitive-intent, metastasis-directed radiotherapy to all new or progressing sites with concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. Progression-free survival, freedom from new lines of systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of metastasis-directed radiotherapy using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Biochemical response was defined as at least a 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen 6 mo after the start of treatment. Toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Results: Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 33.8 mo (interquartile range, 27.6–45.1 mo). Between October 2017 and April 2023, 11 patients (45.8%) had 1 treated site, 10 patients (41.7%) had 2, and 3 patients (12.5%) had 3. Five sites were prostate or prostate bed, 15 were nodal, 19 were osseous, and 1 was visceral. Seventeen patients (70.8%) continued their preexisting systemic therapy, whereas 7 (29.2%) started a new systemic therapy. Median progression-free survival was 16.4 mo (95% CI, 9.8–23.0 mo). The biochemical response rate was 66.7%. Median freedom from a new line of systemic therapy was 29.0 mo (95% CI, 7.6–50.4 mo). Median OS was not reached. The 2- and 4-y OS rates were 91.1% (95% CI, 79.3%–100%) and 68.8% (95% CI, 45.1%–92.5%), respectively. Grade 2 and grade 3 or higher toxicity rates were 4.2% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT–guided, metastasis-directed radiotherapy appears to offer durable disease control with low toxicity rates for oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to compare metastasis-directed radiotherapy with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone and PSMA PET/CT–guided versus conventional imaging–guided radiotherapy.