PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Christiane Schuchardt
AU  - Jingjing Zhang
AU  - Harshad R. Kulkarni
AU  - Xiaoyuan Chen
AU  - Dirk Müller
AU  - Richard P. Baum
TI  - Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy Using <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA I&T and <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry
AID  - 10.2967/jnumed.121.262713
DP  - 2022 Aug 01
TA  - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
PG  - 1199--1207
VI  - 63
IP  - 8
4099  - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/63/8/1199.short
4100  - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/63/8/1199.full
SO  - J Nucl Med2022 Aug 01; 63
AB  - The objective of this study was to determine the safety, kinetics, and dosimetry of the 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) small molecules 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in a large cohort of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT). Methods: In total, 138 patients (mean age, 70 ± 9 y; age range, 46–90 y) with progressive mCRPC and PSMA expression verified by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT underwent PRLT. Fifty-one patients received 6.1 ± 1.0 GBq (range, 3.4–7.6 GBq) of 177Lu-PSMA I&T, and 87 patients received 6.5 ± 1.1 GBq (range, 3.5–9.0 GBq) of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Dosimetry was performed on all patients using an identical protocol. The mean absorbed doses were estimated with OLINDA software (MIRD Scheme). Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, of the National Cancer Institute. Results: The whole-body half-lives were shorter for 177Lu-PSMA I&T (35 h) than for 177Lu-PSMA-617 (42 h). The mean whole-body dose of 177Lu-PSMA-617 was higher than that of 177Lu-PSMA I&T (0.04 vs. 0.03 Gy/GBq, P < 0.00001). Despite the longer half-life of 177Lu-PSMA-617, the renal dose was lower for 177Lu-PSMA-617 than for 177Lu-PSMA I&T (0.77 vs. 0.92 Gy/GBq, P = 0.0015). Both PSMA small molecules demonstrated a comparable dose to the parotid glands (0.5 Gy/GBq, P = 0.27). Among all normal organs, the lacrimal glands exhibited the highest mean absorbed doses, 5.1 and 3.7 Gy/GBq, for 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T, respectively. All tumor metastases exhibited a higher initial uptake when using 177Lu-PSMA I&T than when using 177Lu-PSMA-617, as well as a shorter tumor half-life (P < 0.00001). The mean absorbed tumor doses were comparable for both 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 (5.8 vs. 5.9 Gy/GBq, P = 0.96). All patients tolerated the therapy without any acute adverse effects. After 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T, there was a small, statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin, leukocyte counts, and platelet counts that did not need any clinical intervention. No nephrotoxicity was observed after either 177Lu-PSMA I&T or 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT. Conclusion: Both 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT demonstrated favorable safety in mCRPC patients. The highest absorbed doses among healthy organs were in the lacrimal and parotid glands—not, however, resulting in any significant clinical sequel. 177Lu-PSMA-617 demonstrated a higher absorbed dose to the whole-body and lacrimal glands but a lower renal dose than did 177Lu-PSMA I&T. The mean absorbed tumor doses were comparable for both 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617. There was a large interpatient variability in the dosimetry parameters. Therefore, individual patient-based dosimetry seems favorable for personalized PRLT.