PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Justin Ferdinandus
AU  - Wolfgang Peter Fendler
AU  - Andrea Farolfi
AU  - Samuel Washington
AU  - Osama Mohammad
AU  - Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni
AU  - Peter J Scott
AU  - Melissa Rodnick
AU  - Benjamin L Viglianti
AU  - Matthias Eiber
AU  - Ken Herrmann
AU  - Johannes Czernin
AU  - Wesley Robert Armstrong
AU  - Jeremie Calais
AU  - Thomas A. Hope
AU  - Morand A. Piert
TI  - PSMA PET validates higher rates of metastatic disease for European Association of Urology Biochemical Recurrence Risk Groups: an international multicenter study
AID  - 10.2967/jnumed.121.262821
DP  - 2021 Oct 01
TA  - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
PG  - jnumed.121.262821
4099  - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2021/10/07/jnumed.121.262821.short
4100  - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/early/2021/10/07/jnumed.121.262821.full
AB  - Background: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel recommends risk groups for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) to identify men at high risk of progression or metastatic disease. Recent United States Food and Drug Administration approval for 68Ga-PSMA-11 and growing availability of PSMA-directed PET imaging (PSMA PET) will impact disease localization in majority of men with BCR. We determined the rates of local and metastatic disease in recurrent and persistent prostate cancer stratified by EAU BCR risk groups and biochemical persistence (BCP). Patients and Methods: Patients with BCR/BCP were enrolled under the same prospective clinical trial protocol conducted at three sites (n = 1777, 91%; UCLA n = 662, NCT02940262; UCSF n = 508, NCT03353740; Michigan, n = 607, NCT03396874); 183 patients with BCP from Universities of Essen, Bologna, and Munich (TUM) were included retrospectively. Patients with BCR had to have sufficient data to determine EAU risk score. Multivariate, binomial logistic regression models were applied to assess independent predictors of M1 disease. Results: A total of 1960 patients were included. Post-RP EAU BCR low risk, EAU BCR high risk, and BCP groups yield distant metastatic (M1) detection in 43/176 (24%), 342/931 (37%), and 154/386 (40%) of patients. For post-RT EAU BCR low risk and EAU BCR high risk groups, M1 detection rate was 113/309 (37%) and 110/158 (70%), respectively. BCP, high risk BCR and higher levels of serum PSA were significantly associated with PSMA PET M1 disease in multivariate regression analysis. PSMA-PET revealed no disease in 25% and locoregional only disease in 33% of patients with post-RP or post-RT EAU BCR high risk. Conclusion: Our findings support the new EAU classification; EAU BCR high-risk groups have higher rates of metastatic disease on PSMA PET than the low-risk groups. Discordant subgroups, including metastatic disease in low risk and no disease in high risk patients warrant inclusion of PSMA PET stage to refine risk assessment.