The 1970s was the inaugural decade of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Initial imaging with 43K in 1973 was followed by the potassium analogs 82Rb in 1974 and 201Tl in 1976. Because of its ease of imaging with the γ-camera, 201Tl became the MPI agent of choice until the clinical availability of the 99mTc agents in 1990.
Within its first decade, MPI was extensively validated for a wide range of clinical applications including its use for diagnosing coronary artery disease, sizing the magnitude of inducible myocardial ischemia, assessing angiographic stenoses of borderline significance, and evaluating myocardial viability. Initial studies of quantitation were also introduced, providing objective measurements of perfusion defects and, given the washout characteristics of 201Tl, even allowing for the detection of balanced reduction of flow. One particular development in the 1970s was unique and ultimately far-reaching: development of the ability to assess regional myocardial perfusion with pharmacologic agents, thus extending the application of MPI to patients who could not exercise.
In this context, an article in JNM published by the late Glenn Hamilton, one of Lance Gould’s key collaborators, with Lance Gould as the senior author, has been selected as one of the most important papers in the JNM from the 1970s (1). This work was one of a series of papers in which Gould and a team of investigators at the University of Washington systematically studied dipyridamole and 201Tl planar imaging in a combination of animal and human studies, after their initial assessments of early coronary blood flow based on contrast-induced coronary vasodilation (1–3). Their work with vasodilator stress had a profound effect on MPI. It not only opened the possibility of imaging patients who could not exercise, but also defined the strengths and limitations of imaging with available perfusion tracers, and laid the groundwork for assessing absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Herein, we highlight their key achievements from that period.
In 1978, they published a series of 6 articles describing MPI with dipyridamole as the vasodilator in dogs and patients. In the initial study using microsphere-measured myocardial blood flow in dogs, they established that the optimal dose of dipyridamole, 0.142 mg/kg/min administered over 4 min, produced an increase in myocardial blood flow 4 min after injection that achieved 95% of maximal flow determined by intracoronary papaverine (2). They further showed that the increase in flow was greater with dipyridamole than with maximal exercise. They simultaneously reported a comparison of 201Tl imaging with both dipyridamole and exercise stress in patients (3), finding improved image quality with dipyridamole stress and that the myocardial-to-background ratio was higher with the patient walking in place after dipyridamole administration—the forerunner of the standard combination of low-level exercise with vasodilator stress that is used today (3). Importantly, in their series of articles, they demonstrated that 201Tl uptake consistently tracked with flow measured by microspheres at flow rates above baseline, but in a nonlinear pattern, confirming an initial observation by Strauss et al. in 1975; that is, as flow increased, the degree of increase in uptake was progressively reduced. In the specific article that was chosen as a highlight for JNM in the 1970s, Hamilton and Gould studied 201Tl distribution in normal dogs with several imaging sessions using dipyridamole and other cardiac drugs (1). Their work included tissue sampling during the final session, with correlation to imaging. They observed that dipyridamole increased the tissue concentration of 201Tl by 60%, further supporting the observation of the roll-off of 201Tl uptake at high flow rates.
The pioneering work of this group continues to reverberate throughout cardiac imaging today. Specifically, since its introduction, the use of pharmacologic testing has grown steadily and now constitutes more than half of cardiac stress tests in most clinical laboratories.
Importantly, the mere need to perform pharmacologic testing in lieu of exercise testing has become one of the principal indicators of adverse prognosis, signaling a 2- to 3-fold increase in cardiac and overall mortality risk compared with patients who can exercise at the time of cardiac stress testing (4). The clinical implications of this observation will be investigated for years to come.
Their subsequent work with pharmacologic stress using PET led to the ability to assess absolute myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (5), which has fueled the marked increase in the use of PET MPI over the last decade. Consistent study has demonstrated that these measurements add significantly to perfusion defects for prognostic assessment (5). Multiple studies have demonstrated that these measurements add significantly to perfusion defects for prognostic assessment (5) and, more recently, that they can predict survival benefit from coronary revascularization (6). Of note, these measurements solve a central limitation of static imaging with SPECT or PET MPI: that of a balanced reduction of blood flow that does not result in regional perfusion defects, potentially underestimating flow abnormality in patients with extensive coronary artery disease. Interesting, it was through the work of Gould’s group in the early 1970s that this phenomenon was first noted.
The ability to assess myocardial flow reserve with vasodilator stress has also enhanced the study of coronary microvascular dysfunction, which is the primary cause of ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (7). This syndrome is an increasingly recognized potential source of chest pain and adverse prognosis, particularly in women.
Thus, the work of Hamilton and Gould has contributed greatly to the past, present, and future of nuclear cardiology. On a personal note, Glenn was brilliant, was so caring about patients and friends, and had a great sense of humor. Lance is a true and continued inspiring giant in the field.
DISCLOSURE
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
- © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
REFERENCES
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- Received for publication June 9, 2020.
- Accepted for publication June 12, 2020.