Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Hepatotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres

Masao Watanabe, Hong Grafe, Jens Theysohn, Benedikt Schaarschmidt, Johannes Ludwig, Leonie Jochheim, Matthias Jeschke, Hartmut Schmidt, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Alexandros Moraitis, Ken Herrmann, Kelsey L. Pomykala and Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, jnumed.122.264996; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264996
Masao Watanabe
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Grafe
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Theysohn
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
3Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benedikt Schaarschmidt
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
3Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Ludwig
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
3Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonie Jochheim
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Jeschke
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hartmut Schmidt
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P. Fendler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandros Moraitis
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelsey L. Pomykala
5Institute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Weber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
2University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Personalized dosimetry holds promise to improve radioembolization treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. To this end, tolerance absorbed doses for nontumor liver tissue are assessed by calculating the mean absorbed dose to the whole nontumor liver tissue (AD-WNTLT), which may be limited by its neglect of nonuniform dose distribution. Thus, we analyzed whether voxel-based dosimetry could be more accurate in predicting hepatotoxicity in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization. Methods: In total, 176 HCC patients were available for this retrospective analysis; of these, 78 underwent partial- and 98 whole-liver treatment. Posttherapeutic changes in bilirubin were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. We performed voxel-based and multicompartment dosimetry using pretherapeutic 99mTc-labeled human serum albumin SPECT and contrast-enhanced CT/MRI and defined the following dosimetry parameters: AD-WNTLT; the nontumor liver tissue volume exposed to at least 20 Gy (V20), at least 30 Gy (V30), and at least 40 Gy (V40); and the threshold absorbed dose to the 20% (AD-20) and 30% (AD-30) of nontumor liver tissue with the lowest absorbed dose. Their impact on hepatotoxicity after 6 mo was analyzed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve; thresholds were identified using the Youden index. Results: The area under the curve for prediction of posttherapeutic grade 3+ increases in bilirubin was acceptable for V20 (0.77), V30 (0.78), and V40 (0.79), whereas it was low for AD-WNTLT (0.67). The predictive value could further be increased in the subanalysis of patients with whole-liver treatment, where a good discriminatory power was found for V20 (0.80), V30 (0.82), V40 (0.84), AD-20 (0.80), and AD-30 (0.82) and an acceptable discriminatory power was found for AD-WNTLT (0.63). The accuracies of V20 (P = 0.03), V30 (P = 0.009), V40 (P = 0.004), AD-20 (P = 0.04), and AD-30 (P = 0.02) were superior to that of AD-WNTLT but did not differ significantly from each other. The respective thresholds were 78% (V30), 72% (V40), and 43 Gy (AD-30). Statistical significance was not reached for partial-liver treatment. Conclusion: Voxel-based dosimetry may more accurately predict hepatotoxicity than multicompartment dosimetry in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization, which could enable dose escalation or deescalation with the intent to optimize treatment response. Our results indicate that a V40 of 72% may be particularly useful in whole-liver treatment. However, further research is warranted to validate these results.

  • SIRT
  • liver toxicity
  • voxel-based dosimetry
  • multicompartment dosimetry
  • radioembolization

Footnotes

  • Published online Jun. 8, 2023.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 9
September 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Hepatotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Hepatotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres
Masao Watanabe, Hong Grafe, Jens Theysohn, Benedikt Schaarschmidt, Johannes Ludwig, Leonie Jochheim, Matthias Jeschke, Hartmut Schmidt, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Alexandros Moraitis, Ken Herrmann, Kelsey L. Pomykala, Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, jnumed.122.264996; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264996

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Hepatotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres
Masao Watanabe, Hong Grafe, Jens Theysohn, Benedikt Schaarschmidt, Johannes Ludwig, Leonie Jochheim, Matthias Jeschke, Hartmut Schmidt, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Alexandros Moraitis, Ken Herrmann, Kelsey L. Pomykala, Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, jnumed.122.264996; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264996
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Characterization of [18F]T-008, a Cholesterol 24-Hydroxylase PET Ligand: Dosimetry, Kinetic Modeling, Variability, and Soticlestat Occupancy
  • PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment and Overall Survival Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors
  • An Intrapatient Dosimetry Comparison of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 and 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • SIRT
  • liver toxicity
  • voxel-based dosimetry
  • multicompartment dosimetry
  • radioembolization
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire