Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations (Human)
Open Access

Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study

Andrei Gafita, Isabel Rauscher, Manuel Weber, Boris Hadaschik, Hui Wang, Wesley Robert Armstrong, Robert Tauber, Tristan R. Grogan, Johannes Czernin, Matthew B. Rettig, Ken Herrmann, Jeremie Calais, Wolfgang A. Weber, Matthias Benz, Wolfgang P. Fendler and Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, jnumed.121.263072; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263072
Andrei Gafita
1 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel Rauscher
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Weber
3 University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Hadaschik
3 University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Wang
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wesley Robert Armstrong
1 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Tauber
4 Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tristan R. Grogan
5 David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
1 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Rettig
6 Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
3 University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremie Calais
1 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang A. Weber
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Benz
1 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P. Fendler
3 University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a novel framework for Response Evaluation Criteria In PSMA-PET/CT (RECIP) 1.0 and a composite response classification which combines responses by PSA measurements and by RECIP 1.0 (PSA+RECIP). Methods: This was an international, multicenter, retrospective study. 124 men with mCRPC who underwent 177Lu-PSMA therapy and received PSMA-PET/CT at baseline (bPET) and at interim at 12 weeks (iPET) were included. Pairs of bPET and iPET were interpreted by consensus among three blinded readers for appearance of new lesions. Tumor lesions were segmented and total PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-VOL) was obtained. Appearance of new lesions and changes in PSMA-VOL were combined to develop RECIP 1.0, which was defined as: complete response (RECIP-CR: absence of any PSMA-ligand uptake on iPET), partial response (PSMA-PR: decline ≥30% in PSMA-VOL and no appearance of new lesions), progressive disease (RECIP-PD: increase ≥20% in PSMA-VOL and appearance of new lesions), stable disease (RECIP-SD: any condition but RECIP-PR or RECIP-PD). Changes in PSA levels at 12 weeks by PCWG3 were recorded. Responses by PSA+RECIP were defined as: response (PSA decline ≥50% or RECIP-PR/CR) and progression (PSA increase ≥25% or RECIP-PD). Study's primary outcome measure was the prognostic value of RECIP 1.0 for overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome measure was the prognostic accuracy (C-index) of PSA+RECIP vs PSA responses. Results: Patients with progressive disease (RECIP-PD; n = 39; 8.3 mo) had shorter OS compared to patients with stable disease (RECIP-SD; n = 47; 13.1 mo; p<0.001) and to those with partial response (RECIP-PR; n = 38; 21.7 mo; p<0.001). PSA+RECIP had superior C-indices in identifying responders and progressors compared to PSA only: 0.65 vs 0.62 (P = 0.028) and 0.66 vs 0.63 (P = 0.044), respectively. Conclusion: PSMA-PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 is prognostic for OS and can be used as an early response biomarker to monitor efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA in men with mCRPC. PSA+RECIP may be used as a novel composite endpoint in mCRPC clinical trial design.

  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • Radionuclide Therapy
  • 177Lu-PSMA
  • PSMA PET
  • interim PET
  • metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • radionuclide treatment

Footnotes

  • Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: https://jnm.snmjournals.org/page/permissions.

  • Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 5
May 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study
Andrei Gafita, Isabel Rauscher, Manuel Weber, Boris Hadaschik, Hui Wang, Wesley Robert Armstrong, Robert Tauber, Tristan R. Grogan, Johannes Czernin, Matthew B. Rettig, Ken Herrmann, Jeremie Calais, Wolfgang A. Weber, Matthias Benz, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, jnumed.121.263072; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263072

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study
Andrei Gafita, Isabel Rauscher, Manuel Weber, Boris Hadaschik, Hui Wang, Wesley Robert Armstrong, Robert Tauber, Tristan R. Grogan, Johannes Czernin, Matthew B. Rettig, Ken Herrmann, Jeremie Calais, Wolfgang A. Weber, Matthias Benz, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, jnumed.121.263072; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263072
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Clinical Investigations (Human)

  • Using, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for therapy response assessment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an application of EAU/EANM recommendations in clinical practice.
  • Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Post-Surgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate or high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: PET findings correlate with outcomes after definitive treatment
Show more Clinical Investigations (Human)

Clinical (Radionuclide Therapy)

  • mCRPC patients receiving 225Ac-PSMA-617 therapy in post androgen deprivation therapy setting: Response to treatment and survival analysis
  • Analysis of short term and stable DNA damage in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated with 131I in hypothyroidism or with rhTSH for remnant ablation
Show more Clinical (Radionuclide Therapy)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • radionuclide therapy
  • 177Lu-PSMA
  • PSMA PET
  • interim PET
  • metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • radionuclide treatment
SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire