Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

First Safety and Efficacy Data with the Radiohybrid 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 for the Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Alexander Dierks, Alexander Gäble, Andreas Rinscheid, Georgine Wienand, Christian H. Pfob, Malte Kircher, Johanna S. Enke, Tilman Janzen, Marianne Patt, Martin Trepel, Dorothea Weckermann, Ralph A. Bundschuh and Constantin Lapa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2024, 65 (3) 432-437; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266741
Alexander Dierks
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Gäble
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Rinscheid
2Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgine Wienand
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian H. Pfob
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malte Kircher
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna S. Enke
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tilman Janzen
2Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianne Patt
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Trepel
3Internal Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dorothea Weckermann
4Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph A. Bundschuh
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantin Lapa
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

We recently published the first dosimetry data, to our knowledge, for the radioligand therapy agent 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, providing an intrapatient comparison with 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Here, we report efficacy and safety findings from these patients. Methods: Four consecutive patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive metastatic prostate cancer received up to 6 cycles of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 (7.4–7.7 GBq per cycle). Efficacy (prostate-specific antigen response according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria and the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT), progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Adverse events were recorded from the first dose until 16–24 mo after treatment. Results: The patients received a total activity of 29.6–59.4 GBq (4–6 cycles). Prostate-specific antigen was reduced by 100%, 99%, 88%, and 35%. Progression-free survival was not reached for 2 patients at 24 and 18 mo of follow-up and was 15 and 12 mo for the other 2 patients. One patient had a sustained complete response with 2 y of follow up. All patients were alive at the last time point of data collection. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 demonstrated encouraging preliminary efficacy and was well tolerated. Formal clinical trials are now under way to evaluate its potential prospectively (NCT05413850).

  • prostate cancer
  • radioligand therapy
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • therapeutic response

A recently developed radiohybrid technology platform has enabled engineering of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted ligands (rhPSMA) that can be labeled with 18F for diagnostic imaging or with α- or β-emitting radiometals for systemic radiation therapy (1). The lead diagnostic rhPSMA, 18F-flotufolastat (18F-rhPSMA-7.3), was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for diagnostic imaging in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer (2,3). A pharmacokinetically tuned 177Lu-labeled rhPSMA therapeutic candidate for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, has shown encouraging results in a series of preclinical assessments (4,5).

We recently reported the first clinical data, to our knowledge, comparing pretherapeutic dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 with 177Lu-PSMA-I&T (6). In an intrapatient comparison in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, we were able to show that 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 delivers an increased radiation dose to the tumor compared with 177Lu-PSMA-I&T, reaching an up to 8-fold improvement in tumor dose in one of the patients (6). Data on the recently approved 177Lu-labeled vipivotide tetraxetan (177Lu-PSMA-617) suggest that the greater the radiation dose delivered to the tumor, the better the response observed (7,8). Additionally, data from the use of external-beam radiation therapy in over 30,000 patients with prostate cancer are highly supportive of longer survival in patients receiving higher radiation doses to their tumor (9). Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate a more favorable tumor-to-kidney therapeutic index (TI), defined as the mean absorbed radiation dose to tumors divided by the absorbed dose to kidneys, for 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 than for 177Lu-PSMA-I&T. This is of clinical importance because the kidneys are a significant organ at risk in patients undergoing radioligand therapy (RLT) (10) and because as the use of such compounds moves earlier in the disease timeline, possibly even into the curative setting, the risk of a delayed radiation nephropathy may increase.

As a result of the favorable TI of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, and in the absence of an approved RLT in Germany at that time, all 4 patients in our analysis ultimately proceeded to receive RLT with 177Lu-PSMA-10.1. Here, we report the efficacy and safety findings among these 4 patients who, to the best of our knowledge, were the first globally to receive RLT with 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiopharmaceutical Preparation and Approval

As previously reported (6), all investigations were conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and with national regulations. The local institutional review board (review board of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) approved this analysis (permit 22-1011). 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 was prepared in compliance with the German Medicinal Products Act, Arzneimittelgesetz §13 2b, and after informing the responsible regulatory body. All patients gave written informed consent to the imaging and therapeutic procedures.

Patients and Lesions

Four consecutive patients with metastatic prostate cancer were included in this retrospective analysis. All subjects were previously treated with a spectrum of prostate cancer therapies including surgery, radiation therapy, androgen deprivation, novel androgen-axis drugs, and chemotherapy. To be eligible, the patients were required to have PSMA-positive metastatic prostate cancer, defined by the presence of at least 1 PSMA-positive metastatic lesion and no PSMA-negative lesions. The presence of PSMA-positive lesions was determined with 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and defined in accordance with the criteria used in the VISION trial (11). PSMA expression was also assessed using the PSMA PET tumor–to–salivary gland ratio (12).

The SUVmax of the most avid metastasis was measured with 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT. Additionally, each PET scan was analyzed with a semiautomatic tumor segmentation algorithm (LIFEx software (13)). The total PSMA-positive tumor volume was estimated as previously described using an absolute SUV threshold of at least 3 for segmentation (14). Physiologic uptake sites, such as salivary glands, liver, spleen, kidneys, intestine, ureters, and urinary bladder, were manually excluded.

After sufficient PSMA expression was confirmed, the patients underwent dosimetry with both 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 and 177Lu-PSMA-I&T to determine the TI (6). All 4 patients went on to receive treatment with 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 because it was determined to provide the more favorable TI (6).

Therapeutic Dosimetry of First Treatment Cycle

Therapeutic dosimetry in 3 of 4 patients (patient 4 was excluded because of claustrophobia) was conducted after the first treatment cycle as previously described (6).

177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 Therapy and Response Assessment

The patients received up to 6 cycles of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 (7.4–7.7 GBq), with an interval of 6 wk between cycles.

Efficacy, or serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, was evaluated using Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria (15) and the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (16). In addition, estimations of progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated until the last evaluated time point (July 2023).

Safety

All patients were monitored for the frequency of adverse events and treatment-related adverse events graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (17) from the first dose of treatment to 24 mo after treatment.

Blood samples for monitoring of hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, alkaline phosphatase, and liver parameters were obtained directly before RLT and every 2–4 wk thereafter.

Statistics

Most of the reported data are descriptive. All continuous data are reported as mean, SD, and range.

RESULTS

Patients

Four patients aged between 65 and 80 y were included in the analysis. Three of 4 patients presented with bone metastases, and 2 presented with lymph node involvement. Their clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Clinical Characteristics

PSMA Expression

All patients were positive for PSMA according to the VISION criteria (11), with the SUVmax of the most avid metastasis ranging between 10.1 and 97.1. Two patients were rated 2, and 2 patients were rated 3, using the PSMA PET tumor–to–salivary gland ratio (12). The PSMA-positive tumor volume varied greatly across patients (range, 7.9–118.3 cm3). Pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-I&T scans of patients 1 and 4 can be found in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Example of tumor response to RLT with 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1: 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT at baseline (A and D), at end of treatment with 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 (B and E), and during follow-up (C and F) of patients 1 (top) and 4 (bottom).

Therapy

Three of the 4 patients had previously undergone prostatectomy. The patients’ treatment before and during 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 is presented in Figure 2. The patients received 4–6 cycles of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 (Table 2). In posttherapeutic dosimetry for the first treatment cycle, tumor-absorbed doses for reference lesions varied between 0.23 and 0.87 mGy/MBq injected dose of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 in patient 1, 0.93–1.24 mGy/MBq in patient 2, and 5.5–8.9 mGy/MBq in patient 3, whereas in patient 4, no dosimetry could be performed because of claustrophobia (6).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Patients’ treatment before and during 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1. All 4 patients were followed up until July 2023. Number of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 cycles is indicated by number in green bar. CR = complete response; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; RP = radical prostatectomy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 Treatment and Response

All 4 patients showed a PSA response while receiving 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 as presented in Figure 3. Progression-free survival was not reached for 2 patients at 24 and 18 mo of follow up and was 12 and 15 mo in the other 2 patients.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Waterfall plot to show each patient’s response to 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1

As of July 2023, all patients were alive, with 1 patient showing an ongoing complete response more than 2 y after starting RLT. Two patients had a partial response, with one having residual lesions in the pelvic lymph nodes and the other having residual disease in the local tumor, thoracic lymph node, and bone. The remaining patient showed disease progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (16).

Safety

No serious or treatment-related adverse events were reported. All reported events are listed in Table 3 and Supplemental Table 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). All events were mild and graded 1 or 2 according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (17).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events

DISCUSSION

Here, we present efficacy and safety data from the clinical use of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 RLT in 4 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Our data show that 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 was well tolerated and induced a profound PSA response in 3 of 4 patients, with a smaller PSA response in the fourth patient.

We previously showed that, in the same 4 patients, 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 provided a high TI, indicating a high dose to tumors relative to the absorbed dose to the kidneys. The present data extend these findings to demonstrate that this was able to bring about a remarkable complete response in 1 patient that was still ongoing after more than 2 y of follow-up, with 2 further patients showing partial responses that comprised a 99% and 88% decrease in PSA. The patients received therapeutic 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 activities of between 7.4 and 7.7 GBq per cycle. The favorable TI with 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 raises the possibility that the administered therapeutic activities of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 could be optimized according to patient need—maximizing tumor-absorbed doses in patients with significantly shortened life expectancy while tolerating higher kidney-absorbed radiation doses. For patients who are earlier in the disease timeline and have a longer life expectancy, the radiation exposure to the kidneys could be reduced while still achieving an effective dose to the tumor (6).

Our previous data from these patients show that the dose to the tumor varied by patient and by lesion. Data derived with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer suggest that efficacy increases when a higher radiation dose is delivered to the tumor (7,18). In the present study, we used the criteria applied in the VISION study to determine the PSMA positivity of lesions before initiating RLT (i.e., SUV greater than liver) (11). Notably, the patient showing the lowest SUV (SUVmax, 10.1; patient 2) and a highly variable tumor-absorbed dose was the only patient who showed any disease progression. Despite a 35% reduction in PSA during his 5 cycles of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, this patient was determined to have progressive disease at the end of treatment. This perhaps highlights the importance of identifying predictive factors that may help select patients with the best chance of success before initiation of 177Lu-PSMA–based RLT. Recent studies have proposed nomograms that include pretherapeutic imaging with 68Ga- or 18F-labeled PSMA ligands to help predict outcomes from 177Lu-PSMA–based RLT (19,20). In addition, the use of radiomics features and artificial intelligence applied on pretherapeutic PET has been suggested (21). On the other hand, it has to be acknowledged that in subjects with lower tracer uptake but no other therapeutic options, PSMA therapy may still be preferable to no treatment at all.

Although 177Lu-labeled radiopharmaceuticals are generally well tolerated, the kidneys remain one of the most important normal organs to consider when planning RLT because of the risk of delayed radiation nephropathy (22,23). Although this is less concerning in patients with heavily pretreated disease and a short life expectancy, several years from now it is entirely plausible that this class of agents could be used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies in men with high-risk newly diagnosed prostate cancer undergoing radical primary therapy. Therefore, understanding the exposure to normal organs and the long-term safety is critical. Our data show that there were only minimal adverse events in these patients receiving 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, including grade 1 (mild) chronic kidney disease (17). However, our data are limited by a maximum follow-up period of 24 mo, and data extending many years might be necessary to detect a safety signal.

There are some limitations to the present work. Whereas the follow-up period of up to 24 mo after treatment is longer than for most other studies, even longer-term safety data are needed to accurately quantify the risk to normal-organ function. We report data from only a small number of patients who were the first to receive 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 RLT at our clinic. The encouraging findings, however, show 177Lu-labeled rhPSMA compounds to be suitable candidates for clinical translation, and the results of the ongoing phase 1/2 clinical trial of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT05413850) are eagerly anticipated.

CONCLUSION

These clinical data from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 RLT show 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 to be well tolerated and, in all 4 patients evaluated, to bring about PSA responses accompanied by durable radiologic responses to therapy.

DISCLOSURE

Constantin Lapa reports prior consulting activities for Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd. and Novartis. Ralph Bundschuh is a consultant for and has received speaker honoraria from Bayer Healthcare, Novartis, and Eisai GmbH and has received travel expenses from Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Does 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 provide a therapeutic response in patients with metastatic prostate cancer?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: In these 4 patients who received RLT with 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, no serious adverse events were noted. All 4 patients showed a PSA response, with 1 patient showing a complete biochemical and radiologic response that was maintained for the 2 y until last follow-up.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 is well tolerated and brought about decreases in PSA levels ranging from 33% to 100% in all patients evaluated. Prospective clinical studies are under way to confirm these findings (NCT05413850).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Medical writing support was provided by Dr. Catriona Turnbull (Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd.).

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 21, 2023.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wurzer A,
    2. DiCarlo D,
    3. Schmidt A,
    4. et al
    . Radiohybrid ligands: a novel tracer concept exemplified by 18F- or 68Ga-labeled rhPSMA inhibitors. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:735–742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Surasi DS,
    2. Eiber M,
    3. Maurer T,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic performance and safety of positron emission tomography with 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in patients with newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate to very high-risk prostate cancer: results from a phase 3, prospective, multicentre study (LIGHTHOUSE). Eur Urol. 2023;84:361–370.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jani AB,
    2. Ravizzini G,
    3. Gartrell BA,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic performance and safety of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET in men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence: results from a phase 3, prospective, multicenter study (SPOTLIGHT). J Urol. 2023;210:299–311.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Foxton C,
    2. Grønlund RV,
    3. Simon J,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical evaluation of a novel radioligand therapy for patients with prostate cancer: biodistribution and efficacy of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 in comparison with 177Lu-PSMA-I&T [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(suppl 2):2567.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Vassileva V,
    2. Grønlund RV,
    3. Waldron B,
    4. Gauden DE,
    5. Stevens DJ,
    6. Foxton C
    . Enhanced therapeutic response to 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 in pre-clinical models of prostate cancer [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(suppl 1):P621.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rinscheid A,
    2. Gäble A,
    3. Wienand G,
    4. et al
    . An intrapatient dosimetry comparison of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 and 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1918–1924.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kuo P,
    2. Hesterman J,
    3. Rahbar K,
    4. et al
    . [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET baseline imaging as a prognostic tool for clinical outcomes to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with mCRPC: a VISION substudy [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl):5002.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Violet J,
    2. Jackson P,
    3. Ferdinandus J,
    4. et al
    . Dosimetry of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: correlations between pretherapeutic imaging and whole-body tumor dosimetry with treatment outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:517–523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kalbasi A,
    2. Li J,
    3. Berman A,
    4. et al
    . Dose-escalated irradiation and overall survival in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:897–906.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Okamoto S,
    2. Thieme A,
    3. Allmann J,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dosimetry for 177Lu-PSMA I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: absorbed dose in normal organs and tumor lesions. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:445–450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sartor O,
    2. de Bono J,
    3. Chi KN,
    4. et al
    . Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hotta M,
    2. Gafita A,
    3. Murthy V,
    4. et al
    . PSMA PET tumor-to-salivary glands ratio (PSG score) to predict response to Lu-177 PSMA radioligand therapy: an international multicenter retrospective study [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(suppl 2):P3040.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nioche C,
    2. Orlhac F,
    3. Boughdad S,
    4. et al
    . LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 2018;78:4786–4789.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ferdinandus J,
    2. Violet J,
    3. Sandhu S,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic biomarkers in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving [177Lu]-PSMA-617. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2322–2327.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Scher HI,
    2. Morris MJ,
    3. Stadler WM,
    4. et al
    . Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1402–1418.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gafita A,
    2. Rauscher I,
    3. Weber M,
    4. et al
    . Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1651–1658.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017; https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf#search=%22CTCAE%20version%205%22.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hohberg M,
    2. Reifegerst M,
    3. Drzezga A,
    4. Wild M,
    5. Schmidt M
    . Prediction of response to 177Lu-PSMA therapy based on tumor-to-kidney ratio on pretherapeutic PSMA PET/CT and posttherapeutic tumor-dose evaluation in mCRPC. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1758–1764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gafita A,
    2. Calais J,
    3. Grogan TR,
    4. et al
    . Nomograms to predict outcomes after 177Lu-PSMA therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international, multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1115–1125.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Rauscher I,
    2. Hansen K,
    3. Gafita A,
    4. et al
    . Extension of a 68Ga-PSMA PET-based nomogram for outcome prediction of 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for the use of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2023;63(suppl 1):P400.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Moazemi S,
    2. Erle A,
    3. Khurshid Z,
    4. et al
    . Decision-support for treatment with 177Lu-PSMA: machine learning predicts response with high accuracy based on PSMA-PET/CT and clinical parameters. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9:818.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tagawa ST,
    2. Sartor O,
    3. Saad F,
    4. et al
    . 647TiP PSMAddition: a phase III trial to compare treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(suppl 5):S673–S675.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Schäfer H,
    2. Mayr S,
    3. Buttner-Herold M,
    4. et al
    . Extensive 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy can lead to radiation nephropathy with a renal thrombotic microangiopathy-like picture. Eur Urol. 2023;83:385–390.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication September 23, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication November 7, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 3
March 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First Safety and Efficacy Data with the Radiohybrid 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 for the Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
First Safety and Efficacy Data with the Radiohybrid 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 for the Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Alexander Dierks, Alexander Gäble, Andreas Rinscheid, Georgine Wienand, Christian H. Pfob, Malte Kircher, Johanna S. Enke, Tilman Janzen, Marianne Patt, Martin Trepel, Dorothea Weckermann, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Constantin Lapa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2024, 65 (3) 432-437; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266741

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
First Safety and Efficacy Data with the Radiohybrid 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 for the Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Alexander Dierks, Alexander Gäble, Andreas Rinscheid, Georgine Wienand, Christian H. Pfob, Malte Kircher, Johanna S. Enke, Tilman Janzen, Marianne Patt, Martin Trepel, Dorothea Weckermann, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Constantin Lapa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2024, 65 (3) 432-437; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266741
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preclinical Evaluation of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, a Radiopharmaceutical for Prostate Cancer: Biodistribution and Therapeutic Efficacy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • radioligand therapy
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • therapeutic response
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire