Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigation

Dosimetric Variability Across a Library of Computational Tumor Phantoms

Lukas M. Carter, Simone Krebs, Harry Marquis, Juan C. Ocampo Ramos, Edmond A. Olguin, Emilia O. Mason, Wesley E. Bolch, Pat B. Zanzonico and Adam L. Kesner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 64 (5) 782-790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264916
Lukas M. Carter
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simone Krebs
2Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harry Marquis
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan C. Ocampo Ramos
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmond A. Olguin
3Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilia O. Mason
4Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wesley E. Bolch
5J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pat B. Zanzonico
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam L. Kesner
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

In radiopharmaceutical therapy, dosimetry-based treatment planning and response evaluation require accurate estimates of tumor-absorbed dose. Tumor dose estimates are routinely derived using simplistic spherical models, despite the well-established influence of tumor geometry on the dosimetry. Moreover, the degree of disease invasiveness correlates with departure from ideal geometry; malignant lesions often possess lobular, spiculated, or otherwise irregular margins in contrast to the commonly regular or smooth contours characteristic of benign lesions. To assess the effects of tumor shape, size, and margin contour on absorbed dose, an array of tumor geometries was modeled using computer-aided design software, and the models were used to calculate absorbed dose per unit of time-integrated activity (i.e., S values) for several clinically applied therapeutic radionuclides (90Y, 131I, 177Lu, 211At, 225Ac, 213Bi, and 223Ra). Methods: Three-dimensional tumor models of several different shape classifications were generated using Blender software. Ovoid shapes were generated using axial scaling. Lobulated, spiculated, and irregular contours were generated using noise-based mesh deformation. The meshes were rigidly scaled to different volumes, and S values were then computed using PARaDIM software. Radiomic features were extracted for each shape, and the impact on S values was examined. Finally, the systematic error present in dose calculations that model complex tumor shapes versus equivalent-mass spheres was estimated. Results: The dependence of tumor S values on shape was largest for extreme departures from spherical geometry and for long-range emissions (e.g., 90Y β-emissions). S values for spheres agreed reasonably well with lobulated, spiculated, or irregular contours if the surface perturbation was small. For marked deviations from spherical shape and small volumes, the systematic error of the equivalent-sphere approximation increased to 30%–75% depending on radionuclide. The errors were largest for shapes with many long spicules and for spherical shells with a thickness less than or comparable to the particle range in tissue. Conclusion: Variability in tumor S values as a function of tumor shape and margin contour was observed, suggesting use of contour-matched phantoms to improve the accuracy of tumor dosimetry in organ-level dosimetry paradigms. Implementing a library of tumor phantoms in organ-level dosimetry software may facilitate optimization strategies for personalized radionuclide therapies.

  • tumor dosimetry
  • phantoms
  • MIRD
  • Monte Carlo

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 8, 2022.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 5
May 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dosimetric Variability Across a Library of Computational Tumor Phantoms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dosimetric Variability Across a Library of Computational Tumor Phantoms
Lukas M. Carter, Simone Krebs, Harry Marquis, Juan C. Ocampo Ramos, Edmond A. Olguin, Emilia O. Mason, Wesley E. Bolch, Pat B. Zanzonico, Adam L. Kesner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 64 (5) 782-790; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264916

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dosimetric Variability Across a Library of Computational Tumor Phantoms
Lukas M. Carter, Simone Krebs, Harry Marquis, Juan C. Ocampo Ramos, Edmond A. Olguin, Emilia O. Mason, Wesley E. Bolch, Pat B. Zanzonico, Adam L. Kesner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 64 (5) 782-790; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264916
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • [123I]CC1: A PARP-Targeting, Auger Electron–Emitting Radiopharmaceutical for Radionuclide Therapy of Cancer
  • Tumor-Targeted Interleukin 2 Boosts the Anticancer Activity of FAP-Directed Radioligand Therapeutics
  • Development of FAPI Tetramers to Improve Tumor Uptake and Efficacy of FAPI Radioligand Therapy
Show more Basic Science Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Tumor dosimetry
  • phantoms
  • MIRD
  • Monte Carlo
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire