Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Initial Results of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Philipp Backhaus, Matthias C. Burg, Inga Asmus, Michaela Pixberg, Florian Büther, Hans-Jörg Breyholz, Randy Yeh, Stefanie B. Weigel, Patricia Stichling, Walter Heindel, Stefanie Bobe, Peter Barth, Joke Tio and Michael Schäfers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 64 (5) 717-723; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264871
Philipp Backhaus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias C. Burg
4Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inga Asmus
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michaela Pixberg
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florian Büther
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
2European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Jörg Breyholz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randy Yeh
3Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie B. Weigel
4Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Stichling
4Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Heindel
4Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie Bobe
2European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany;
5Gerhard-Domagk Institute for Pathology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Barth
5Gerhard-Domagk Institute for Pathology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joke Tio
6Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Schäfers
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
2European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Improving imaging-based response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer assessment could obviate histologic confirmation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and facilitate deescalation of chemotherapy or surgery. Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/MRI is a promising novel molecular imaging agent for the tumor microenvironment with intense uptake in breast cancer. We assessed the diagnostic performance of follow-up breast 68Ga-FAPI-46 (68Ga-FAPI) PET/MRI in classifying the response status of local breast cancer and lymph node metastases after completion of NAC and validated this approach immunohistochemically. Methods: In women who completed NAC for invasive breast cancer, follow-up 68Ga-FAPI PET/MRI and corresponding fibroblast activation protein (FAP) immunostainings were retrospectively analyzed. Metrics of 68Ga-FAPI uptake and FAP immunoreactivity in women with or without pCR were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Diagnostic performance to detect remnant invasive cancer was calculated for tracer uptake metrics using receiver-operating-characteristic curves and for masked readers’ visual assessment categories of PET/MRI and MRI alone. Results: Thirteen women (mean age ± SD, 47 ± 9 y) were evaluated. Seven of the 13 achieved pCR in the breast and 6 in the axilla. FAP immunoreactivity was significantly associated with response status. The 68Ga-FAPI PET/MRI mean breast tumor-to-background ratio was 0.9 (range, 0.6–1.2) for pCR and 2.1 (range, 1.4–3.1) for no pCR (P = 0.001). Integrated PET/MRI could classify breast response correctly in all 13 women based on readers’ visual assessment or tumor-to-background ratio. Evaluation of MRI alone resulted in at least 2 false-positives. For lymph nodes, PET/MRI readers had at least 2 false-negative classifications, whereas MRI alone resulted in 2 false-negatives and 1 false-positive. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this was the first analysis of 68Ga-FAPI PET/MRI for response assessment after NAC for breast cancer. The diagnostic performance of PET/MRI in a small study sample trended toward a gain over MRI alone, clearly supporting future prospective studies.

  • FAPI
  • PET/MRI
  • breast cancer
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • deescalation

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 17, 2022.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 5
May 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Initial Results of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Initial Results of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Philipp Backhaus, Matthias C. Burg, Inga Asmus, Michaela Pixberg, Florian Büther, Hans-Jörg Breyholz, Randy Yeh, Stefanie B. Weigel, Patricia Stichling, Walter Heindel, Stefanie Bobe, Peter Barth, Joke Tio, Michael Schäfers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 64 (5) 717-723; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264871

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Initial Results of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Philipp Backhaus, Matthias C. Burg, Inga Asmus, Michaela Pixberg, Florian Büther, Hans-Jörg Breyholz, Randy Yeh, Stefanie B. Weigel, Patricia Stichling, Walter Heindel, Stefanie Bobe, Peter Barth, Joke Tio, Michael Schäfers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 64 (5) 717-723; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264871
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment and Overall Survival Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors
  • Clinical Characterization of [18F]T-008, a Cholesterol 24-Hydroxylase PET Ligand: Dosimetry, Kinetic Modeling, Variability, and Soticlestat Occupancy
  • An Intrapatient Dosimetry Comparison of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 and 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • FAPI
  • PET/MRI
  • breast cancer
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • deescalation
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire