Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Three-Time-Point PET Analysis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a Variety of Cancers

Mahnoosh Naeimi, Peter L. Choyke, Katharina Dendl, Yuriko Mori, Fabian Staudinger, Tadashi Watabe, Stefan A. Koerber, Manuel Röhrich, Jürgen Debus, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn and Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2023, 64 (4) 618-622; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264941
Mahnoosh Naeimi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter L. Choyke
2Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katharina Dendl
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuriko Mori
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Staudinger
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadashi Watabe
4Department of Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan A. Koerber
5Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Röhrich
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen Debus
5Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Kratochwil
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik L. Giesel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany;
6Institute of Radiation Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A growing family of 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET probes has shown promise in imaging a variety of medical conditions. 68Ga-FAPI-46, in particular, has emerged as unique for both its diagnostic and its theranostic applications; however, the optimal timing of PET remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated uptake at 3 time points after 68Ga-FAPI-46 administration in a spectrum of tumor types. Methods: The cohort consisted of 43 patients with diverse cancer diagnoses undergoing 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT at 3 time points (10 min, 1 h, and 3 h). We determined the tracer uptake based on SUVmean and SUVmax and on tumor-to-background-ratios (TBRs) (SUVmax/SUVmean). Results: There were 171 lesions in the 43 patients. Comparing all lesions at different time points, the mean SUVmax was maximal at 10 min (8.2) and declined slightly at 1 h (8.15) and 3 h (7.6) after tracer administration. Similarly, the mean SUVmax log still had a similar pattern in primary lesions at 10 min, 1 h, and 3 h (n = 30; 0.98, 1.01, and 0.98, respectively), lymph node metastases (n = 37; 0.82, 0.84, and 0.81, respectively), and distant metastases (n = 104; 0.81, 0.79, and 0.74, respectively). TBR also showed nonsignificant differences at the 3 times. Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging revealed remarkably stable tumor and background uptake as determined by SUV metrics and maintained high TBRs within 3 h of injection. Thus, it may be possible to scan with 68Ga-FAPI-46 within 10–20 min of injection, improving workflow and decreasing patient wait times. Confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort is under way.

  • FAPI
  • fibroblast activation protein
  • PET
  • PET/CT
  • 3-time-point

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 10, 2022.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 4
April 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Three-Time-Point PET Analysis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a Variety of Cancers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Three-Time-Point PET Analysis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a Variety of Cancers
Mahnoosh Naeimi, Peter L. Choyke, Katharina Dendl, Yuriko Mori, Fabian Staudinger, Tadashi Watabe, Stefan A. Koerber, Manuel Röhrich, Jürgen Debus, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2023, 64 (4) 618-622; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264941

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Three-Time-Point PET Analysis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a Variety of Cancers
Mahnoosh Naeimi, Peter L. Choyke, Katharina Dendl, Yuriko Mori, Fabian Staudinger, Tadashi Watabe, Stefan A. Koerber, Manuel Röhrich, Jürgen Debus, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2023, 64 (4) 618-622; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264941
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Characterization of [18F]T-008, a Cholesterol 24-Hydroxylase PET Ligand: Dosimetry, Kinetic Modeling, Variability, and Soticlestat Occupancy
  • PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment and Overall Survival Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors
  • An Intrapatient Dosimetry Comparison of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1 and 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • FAPI
  • fibroblast activation protein
  • PET
  • PET/CT
  • 3-time-point
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire