Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology

FDG-PET/CT and NaF-PET/CT in the diagnosis and assessment of radiation therapy-induced vascular complications in patients with head and neck cancer

Matthew Griffin, Thomas Werner, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim and Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2718;
Matthew Griffin
1Drexel University College of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Werner
2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
3Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abass Alavi
4University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2718

Introduction: Globally, more than 800,000 people are diagnosed with head and neck cancer each year. These malignancies are treated with varying combinations of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy but many of these patients will receive photon beam radiation therapy (RT) as definitive or adjunct treatment. Despite recent advances, RT interventions are associated with significant toxicity and higher rates of cardiovascular disease, which can present acutely or months to years afterward, often in the form of vasculitis or accelerated atherosclerosis of the irradiated arteries. A 2016 study examining over 14,000 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas found that patients who received RT had a 70% increased risk of ischemic stroke when compared with patients who received surgery alone. RT toxicity is an increasingly recognized cause of morbidity and mortality yet clear guidelines for screening, assessment, and prevention have yet to be established. In this review, we examine the published literature related to the use of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and [18F] sodium-fluoride (NaF-PET) imaging to assess RT-induced vascular complications in patients with head and neck cancer.

Methods: Multiple databases including but not limited to Google Scholar and PubMed were accessed to compile a comprehensive body of literature related to FDG-PET and NaF-PET imaging of RT-induced vascular complications in patients with head and neck cancer. Journal articles examining the use of FDG-PET and NaF-PET in the assessment of RT-induced vasculopathy in other malignancies were referenced as well.

Results: FDG-PET computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has demonstrated clinical utility in the diagnosis and assessment of RT-induced inflammation. Prior studies examining RT-induced heart disease with FDG-PET/CT have demonstrated significant increases in the average standardized uptake value (SUV) mean between pre-RT and post-RT PET scans and noted higher global cardiac SUV means following RT of left-sided lesions. A study that assessed RT-induced vasculopathy in 45 non-small cell lung cancer patients found a significant increase in avg SUVmean of the ascending aorta (AA) and arch of the aorta (AoA) across all patients between pre-RT and post-RT PET scans (p<0.001). Another study that assessed global FDG uptake in the left common carotid (LCC) and AoA of 30 head and neck cancer patients before and after 3 months of photon RT demonstrated significantly increased avg SUVmean in the LCC (p=0.0004) and the AoA (p=0.004).

The elevated risk of ischemic stroke in head and neck cancer patients treated with photon RT is thought to be related, at least in part, to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage DNA and blood vessels accelerate atherosclerotic plaque formation. In this domain, researchers have applied NaF-PET/CT to assess micro-calcification in early atherosclerotic plaques and track their progression through time with high sensitivity. One study with 128 subjects noted that the SUVmax of NaF uptake in the LCC was significantly higher in patients with increased risk of cardiovascular (one-way ANOVA p<0.01) and thromboembolic events (one-way ANOVA p<0.01), while it was significantly lower in patients with a greater level of physical activity (one-way ANOVA p<0.02).

Conclusions: FDG-PET/CT is ideally suited for assessing RT-induced inflammation. Further study is warranted to examine the role of NaF-PET in the diagnosis and assessment of vascular micro-calcification. A combined approach with FDG and NaF-PET might provide further information on the pathologic nature of vascular complications following RT and help differentiate vasculitis from vasculitis with superimposed atherosclerosis. Knowledge gained from the application of these techniques in larger cohorts could inform future RT treatment planning for patients with head and neck cancer and reduce future RT-induced cardiovascular complications.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FDG-PET/CT and NaF-PET/CT in the diagnosis and assessment of radiation therapy-induced vascular complications in patients with head and neck cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
FDG-PET/CT and NaF-PET/CT in the diagnosis and assessment of radiation therapy-induced vascular complications in patients with head and neck cancer
Matthew Griffin, Thomas Werner, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2718;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
FDG-PET/CT and NaF-PET/CT in the diagnosis and assessment of radiation therapy-induced vascular complications in patients with head and neck cancer
Matthew Griffin, Thomas Werner, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2718;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative PSMA expression at early (1hour) vs late (2hour) in primary and secondary sites of involvement in prostate cancer.
  • Imaging spectrum of peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with various etiologies on 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Hybrid Imaging Features of Musculoskeletal Tumors
Show more Oncology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire