Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
NewsSNMMI Newsline

2022 SNMMI Henry N. Wagner, Jr., MD, Best Abstract of the Year

Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (8) 9N;
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

2022 SNMMI Abstract of the Year Excellent sustained response in a 34-year-old male with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Baseline 68Ga-DOTANOC PET maximum-intensity projection image (MIP) (left) shows intense somatostatin receptor expression in the pancreas, multiple abdominopelvic lymph nodes, and extensive liver metastases. The patient underwent 6 cycles of 225Ac-DOTATATE (100–120 kBq/kg body weight; shown left to right in increments of 2 cycles) and remained under followup at 48 months.

A presentation on longer-term outcomes of 225Ac-DOTATATE–targeted α therapy in patients with advanced-stage somatostatin receptor–expressing metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) was named as the Henry N. Wagner, Jr., MD, Abstract of the Year on June 13 at the SNMMI Annual Meeting in Vancouver, Canada. The study, titled “A phase II clinical study on 225Ac-DOTATATE therapy in advanced-stage GEP-NET patients,” was presented by Bal et al. from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (New Delhi). This is the second year that research from this group was recognized with the Best Abstract Award, this time reporting on an expanded cohort with longer follow-up. Each year, SNMMI chooses an abstract that best exemplifies the most promising advances in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. This year, the awardee was chosen from more than 1,000 abstracts submitted for the meeting and voted on by reviewers and society leadership.

The study included 83 GEP-NET patients (34 women, 49 men; mean age, 54 ± 11.6 y; range, 25–74 y), of whom 56 had prior 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment (24 stable disease, 32 progressive disease) and 27 had prior peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. Participants were treated with a median of 4 (range, 1–10) 225Ac-DOTATATE targeted α therapy cycles (100–120 kBq/kg body weight) and a renal protection protocol. Over a median follow-up of 18 months, 24 patients died, with 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) of 85.3% and 67.6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 27 months, estimated median OS was <50%. For the 74 patients who had undergone radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessment, the median rPFS was not reached at the 18-month median follow-up, with 2 patients (2.7%) showing a complete response, 32 (43.2%) a partial response, 25 (34%) presenting with stable disease, and 15 (20%) with progressive disease. A higher percentage of patients who had failed previous 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment showed progressive disease (34%) than those who had not (11%). Only 1 grade 3/4 toxicity was noted.

“225Ac-DOTATATE is a promising therapy option that adds a new dimension to the treatment of end-stage GEP-NETs, especially for patients who have tried all other standard therapy options,” said Chandrasekhar S. Bal, MD, DNB, DSc (HC), professor and head of the Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET at the All India Institute of Medical Science. “These results warrant a phase III randomized control trial to assess the true efficacy of 225Ac-DOTATATE versus 177Lu-DOTATATE.”

“The results from this study not only emphasize the promise and success of targeted α therapies but also reflect growing global interest in these life-extending treatments,” said Heather Jacene, MD, SNMMI Scientific Program Committee chair. “We look forward to further research on this topic in the future.”

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 8
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
2022 SNMMI Henry N. Wagner, Jr., MD, Best Abstract of the Year
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
2022 SNMMI Henry N. Wagner, Jr., MD, Best Abstract of the Year
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (8) 9N;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
2022 SNMMI Henry N. Wagner, Jr., MD, Best Abstract of the Year
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (8) 9N;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 2022 SNMMI Highlights Lecture: Oncology and Therapy, Part 1
  • SNMMI Newsline
  • From the Literature
Show more SNMMI Newsline

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire