Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical (Oncology: GU)

An 89Zr-Labeled PSMA Tracer for PET/CT Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients

Felix Dietlein, Carsten Kobe, Sergio Muñoz Vázquez, Thomas Fischer, Heike Endepols, Melanie Hohberg, Manuel Reifegerst, Bernd Neumaier, Klaus Schomäcker, Alexander E. Drzezga and Markus Dietlein
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, 63 (4) 573-583; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262290
Felix Dietlein
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carsten Kobe
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio Muñoz Vázquez
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Fischer
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heike Endepols
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
3Institute of Radiochemistry and Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Hohberg
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Reifegerst
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd Neumaier
3Institute of Radiochemistry and Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
4Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-5 (Radiochemistry), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Schomäcker
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander E. Drzezga
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
5Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-2, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Dietlein
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

The short half-life of existing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers limits their time for internalization into tumor cells after injection, which is an essential prerequisite for robust detection of tumor lesions with low PSMA expression on PET/CT scans. Because of its longer half-life, the 89Zr-labeled ligand 89Zr-PSMA-DFO allows acquisition of PET scans up to 6 d after injection, thereby overcoming the above limitation. We investigated whether 89Zr-PSMA-DFO allowed more sensitive detection of weak PSMA-positive prostate cancer lesions. Methods: We selected 14 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence who exhibited no PSMA-positive lesions on a PET scan acquired with existing PSMA tracers (68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-JK-PSMA-7). Within 5 wk after the negative scan result, we obtained a second PSMA PET scan using 89Zr-PSMA-DFO (117 ± 16 MBq, PET acquisition within 6 d of injection). Results: 89Zr-PSMA-DFO detected 15 PSMA-positive lesions in 8 of 14 patients, who had a PET-negative reading of their initial PET scans with existing tracers. In these 8 patients, the new scans revealed localized recurrence of disease (3/8), metastases in lymph nodes (3/8), or lesions at distant sites (2/8). On the basis of these results, patients received lesion-targeted radiotherapies (5/8), androgen deprivation therapies (2/8), or no therapy (1/8). The plausibility of 14 of 15 lesions was supported by histology, clinical follow-up after radiotherapy, or subsequent imaging. Furthermore, comparison of the 15 89Zr-PSMA-DFO–positive lesions with their correlates on the original PET scan revealed that established tracers exhibited mild accumulation in 7 of 15 lesions; however, contrast-to-noise ratios were too low for robust detection of these lesions (contrast-to-noise ratios, 2.4 ± 3.7 for established tracers vs. 10.2 ± 8.5 for 89Zr-PSMA-DFO, P = 0.0014). The SUVmax of the 15 89Zr-PSMA-DFO–positive lesions (11.5 ± 5.8) was significantly higher than the SUVmax on the original PET scans (4.7 ± 2.8, P = 0.0001). Kidneys were the most exposed organ, with doses of 3.3 ± 0.7 mGy/MBq. The effective dose was 0.15 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq. Conclusion: In patients with weak PSMA expression, a longer period of time might be needed for ligand internalization than that offered by existing PSMA tracers to make lesions visible on PET/CT scans. Hence, 89Zr-PSMA-DFO might be of significant benefit to patients in whom the search for weak PSMA-positive lesions is challenging. Radiation exposure should be weighed against the potential benefit of metastasis-directed therapy or salvage radiotherapy, which we initiated in 36% (5/14) of our patients based on their 89Zr-PSMA-DFO PET scans.

  • prostate cancer
  • PET
  • PSMA tracer
  • 89Zr-PSMA-DFO
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11
  • 18F-JK-PSMA-7

Footnotes

  • Published online July 29, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 4
April 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An 89Zr-Labeled PSMA Tracer for PET/CT Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
An 89Zr-Labeled PSMA Tracer for PET/CT Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients
Felix Dietlein, Carsten Kobe, Sergio Muñoz Vázquez, Thomas Fischer, Heike Endepols, Melanie Hohberg, Manuel Reifegerst, Bernd Neumaier, Klaus Schomäcker, Alexander E. Drzezga, Markus Dietlein
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 573-583; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262290

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An 89Zr-Labeled PSMA Tracer for PET/CT Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients
Felix Dietlein, Carsten Kobe, Sergio Muñoz Vázquez, Thomas Fischer, Heike Endepols, Melanie Hohberg, Manuel Reifegerst, Bernd Neumaier, Klaus Schomäcker, Alexander E. Drzezga, Markus Dietlein
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 573-583; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262290
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT for characterization of solid renal masses
  • The Impact of Peptide Amount on Tumor Uptake to Assess PSMA Receptor Saturation on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients
  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical (Oncology: GU)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PET
  • PSMA tracer
  • 89Zr-PSMA-DFO
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11
  • 18F-JK-PSMA-7
SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire