Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
NewsSNMMI Newsline

NRC Vetoes T&E Changes; Approves 82Rb and Emerging Tech Modernization

Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, 63 (4) 16N;
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In a public meeting held on January 28, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) commissioners voted to disapprove staff recommendations to change training and experience (T&E) requirements for Authorized Users (AUs) of radiopharmaceuticals. The proposed changes had been the source of comment and protest from major professional societies and their members. In 2020, NRC staff formally recommended that the commission pursue regulatory changes to the T&E requirements, moving to board certification as the sole factor for determining and obtaining AU status and modifying NRC criteria to allow for additional medical specialty board diplomates (beyond nuclear medicine and radiation oncology) to qualify as AUs. In voting down this proposal, one commissioner noted that the proposed changes had suggested “that the current training and experience framework could be viewed as encroaching on the practice of medicine. I disagree. Ensuring that AUs meet training and experience requirements necessary for radiological safety does not insert NRC into the actual practice of medicine. The broad support among medical organizations for NRC’s licensing role makes it clear that the medical community does not view the current framework as encroaching on the practice of medicine.”

SNMMI was among the groups that opposed T&E changes and submitted comments in multiple formats to the NRC. In 2020, Vasken Dilsizian, MD, then SNMMI President, testified before the Commission during a public hearing. He noted that expansion of medical specialty training requirements was not within the purview of the NRC. Moreover, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Oncology, and Diagnostic Radiology with 16-mo Nuclear Medicine/Nuclear Radiology (NM/NR) pathways are the only Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–approved training programs with specific goals and objectives pertaining to administration of radioactive material, and such training must be completed under supervision of board-certified physicians trained in this area.

Feedback from stakeholders was considered by the commissioners in making their decision. Another commissioner stated in his final review: “Many stakeholders offer persuasive arguments that the current T&E framework is working effectively to ensure radiological safety and is not resulting in a shortage of authorized users to administer radiopharmaceuticals.” In a February 4 statement, SNMMI praised the NRC for this decision.

Current pathways for obtaining AU status remain:

  • Certification by a medical specialty board (e.g., the American Board of Nuclear Medicine) recognized by the NRC or an Agreement State;

  • Completion of 200 hours of classroom training and 500 hours of supervised work experience in an ACGME-accredited program (Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology with a 16-month NM/NR pathway, or Radiation Oncology); and

  • Previous identification as an AU on an NRC or Agreement State license or permit.

82Rb Generators and Emerging Medical Technologies

Along with voting on AU T&E requirements, the NRC approved initiation of rulemaking to modernize 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 35 to accommodate the increasing medical applications of radioisotopes and new advances in medical technologies. NRC staff recommended updating Part 35 to establish generally applicable performance-based requirements for emerging medical technologies that would focus on the essential safety-related elements necessary to ensure radiation safety for workers, patients, and the general public. The revised regulation would also include performance-based requirements for 82Rb generators, gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, and 90Y-microspheres. Many stakeholders had expressed an interest in having a regulatory framework well-suited to the advancement and integration of innovative radiopharmaceuticals.

Part 35 does not currently address 82Rb generators, and NRC has relied on enforcement discretion in this area. But, as explained by NRC staff in their proposed rulemaking plan: “Longstanding reliance on temporary enforcement guidance to exercise enforcement discretion is inconsistent with NRC Enforcement Policy and is not a substitute for resolving the underlying technical issues associated with calibration and dosage measurement for 82Rb generators.”

NRC will open comment periods and hold stakeholder response sessions to address proposed changes.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

SNMMI

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 4
April 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
NRC Vetoes T&E Changes; Approves 82Rb and Emerging Tech Modernization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
NRC Vetoes T&E Changes; Approves 82Rb and Emerging Tech Modernization
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 16N;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
NRC Vetoes T&E Changes; Approves 82Rb and Emerging Tech Modernization
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 16N;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • 82Rb Generators and Emerging Medical Technologies
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Newsline
  • New Officers for SNMMI and SNMMI-TS
  • SNMMI Honors New Fellows for 2022
Show more SNMMI Newsline

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire