In the article “Comparative Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of Myocardial Blood Flow and Myocardial Flow Reserve After Cardiac Transplantation,” by Miller et al. (J Nucl Med. 2020 Feb;61(2):249–255), Figures 1 and 4 contain errors.
In Figure 1, the AUC for corrected MFR should be 0.714, as noted in the manuscript text as follows: “There were no significant differences in the ability of stress MBF (AUC, 0.713), MFR (AUC, 0.749), or corrected MFR (AUC, 0.714) to identify patients with significant CAV (Fig. 1).” In Figure 4, the labels for corrected and uncorrected MFR have been switched. The correct AUC for uncorrected MFR should be 0.748 and for correct MFR should be 0.724. This is consistent with the current manuscript text as follows: “Uncorrected MFR showed improved discrimination for all-cause mortality compared with stress MBF (AUC, 0.748 vs. 0.639; P = 0.048).”
Due to these significant errors, we have re-reviewed the manuscript for any discrepancies between the manuscript text and tables/figures. Additionally, we have repeated all analyses to ensure accuracy. During this process, we have not identified any additional errors.
Corrected versions of Figures 1 and 4 appear below; the authors sincerely regret these errors.
- © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.