Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Radium-223 Treated Primary Patient Bone Biopsy Analysis: Macro to Microscale Analyses and Dosimetry

Nadia Benabdallah, Peng Lu, Jeff Michalski, Brian Baumann, Russell Pachynski, Jack Jennings, Robert Hobbs and Daniel Thorek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 531;
Nadia Benabdallah
1Department of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peng Lu
1Department of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
2Department of Biomedical Engineering Washington University St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Michalski
3Department of Radiation Oncology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Baumann
3Department of Radiation Oncology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell Pachynski
4Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Jennings
1Department of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Hobbs
5Department of Radiation Oncology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Thorek
2Department of Biomedical Engineering Washington University St. Louis MO United States
1Department of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

531

Objectives: In nuclear medicine and radiation oncology, dosimetry has an important role in guiding clinical trial design in order to maximize the likelihood of a successful, minimally toxic intervention. For alpha particle-emitting radiopharmaceuticals, personalized dosimetry is challenging because of local activity distribution heterogeneity, the short range of alpha particles and challenges in noninvasive imaging. Existing small-scale dosimetry methods predominately rely on standardized anatomical models of healthy tissues. Moreover, the fundamental assumption in their approach is of a uniform distribution of emitters in the source volume and a calculation that gives the average absorbed dose to the target volume. To overcome these problems, we investigated the microscopic distribution of 223Ra in bone biopsies from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Materials & Methods: Bone biopsies were obtained from four mCRPC patients under fluoroscopic guidance following a bone scan, 24h after injection of 223Ra. Blood samples were also collected at the same time. The 223Ra activity in each biopsy and blood sample was measured with a gamma-counter and evaluated with a high purity Germanium detector (Figure, a and c). Microsctructure images of the tissue was performed for each biopsy by µCT (20 µm resolution) (Figure, b). The samples were then cryosectioned and autoradiography was performed on the sections using a Cyclone PhosphorImager. The same sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histological images were finally segmented using machine learning and registered with autoradiographic images with an automated procedure. The autoradiographies were calibrated using a range of known activity of 223Ra on each phosphor sheet. The biokinetic of the radiopharmaceutical was considered to be fixed thus the cumulated activity was calculated considering only the physical decay. 2D dosimetry was done based on the MIRD formalism. A 3D phantom of each biopsy was created from the µCT acquisition and 3D dosimetry was done using MCNP6 Monte Carlo code. Results & Discussion: Microdistribution analysis revealed localization predominantly to the surface of the bone, with little activity in the marrow cavity surface (Figure, d). Figure-d) shows the automatic analysis workflow for one section and the final result with the absorbed dose distribution. In this section, the mean absorbed doses were found to be 6.3 Gy in the bone and 4.2 Gy in the cellular component. The microdistibution results on the 2D images were implemented in a 3D phantom created with the µCT acquisition to perform a dosimetric evaluation using Monte Carlo simulations. The results were compared to the dosimetric evaluation from existing models using only the activity in the whole biopsy and in the blood samples. Conclusion: Here we have performed fundamental studies to determine the activity concentrations in patients derived samples, and evaluated microstructural characteristics and their role in activity and dose distribution. These results provide the first patient sample microdosimetry values from a primary source. This work will help to improve the current small-scale dosimetry methods and demonstrate that autoradiographic and pathological samples can be used to provide direct and personalized dosimetric data. These results will have important implications for the design and interpretation of clinical studies evaluating treatment with 223Ra; with other investigational alpha particle emitting therapies; to guide clinical application with adapted dosing; and ultimately for more effective application.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radium-223 Treated Primary Patient Bone Biopsy Analysis: Macro to Microscale Analyses and Dosimetry
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Radium-223 Treated Primary Patient Bone Biopsy Analysis: Macro to Microscale Analyses and Dosimetry
Nadia Benabdallah, Peng Lu, Jeff Michalski, Brian Baumann, Russell Pachynski, Jack Jennings, Robert Hobbs, Daniel Thorek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 531;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radium-223 Treated Primary Patient Bone Biopsy Analysis: Macro to Microscale Analyses and Dosimetry
Nadia Benabdallah, Peng Lu, Jeff Michalski, Brian Baumann, Russell Pachynski, Jack Jennings, Robert Hobbs, Daniel Thorek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 531;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

  • A general 11C-carboxylation approach mediated by fluoride-desilylation of organosilanes
  • Relationships between tau, atrophy, regional brain activity and connectivity in Alzheimer's disease: a PET/MRI multimodal study
  • Gray matter structural networks related to 18F-THK5351 retention in cognitively normal older adults and early Alzheimer’s disease patients
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Dosimetry

  • Internal dosimetry in F-18 FDG PET examinations based on long time measured organ activities using total-body PET/CT: dose it makes any difference from a short-time measurement?
  • Risk index: A rational alternative to effective dose for procedure optimization
  • Self-calibration methods for voxel-based dosimetry using 90Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT imaging following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) of liver tumors
Show more Dosimetry

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire