Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Early peak equilibrium is superior to late pseudo-equilibrium for simplified quantification of 18F-FE-PE2I PET

Joachim Brumberg, Vera Kerstens, Zsolt Cselenyi, Per Svenningsson, Sundgren Mathias, Patrik Fazio and Andrea Varrone
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 455;
Joachim Brumberg
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
2Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Wuerzburg Wuerzburg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Kerstens
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zsolt Cselenyi
4PET Science Centre Precision Medicine, R&D, AstraZeneca Stockholm Sweden
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Svenningsson
5Department of Neurology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sundgren Mathias
5Department of Neurology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrik Fazio
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
5Department of Neurology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Varrone
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

455

Introduction: Imaging the presynaptic dopamine transporter (DAT) is important for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism and provides a potential progression marker for Parkinson`s disease (PD). The PET-radioligand 18F-FE-PE2I enables precise quantification of DAT availability, though the optimal time window for shortened acquisition protocols is still under debate. This study examines cross-sectional, test-retest, and longitudinal 18F-FE-PE2I PET data to assess the reliability of simplified binding ratios (SBR) derived from image frames during early peak and late pseudo-equilibrium.

Methods: We enrolled 33 PD patients (63±9y) and 24 healthy controls (62±8y). The participants performed a 93 minute dynamic 18F-FE-PE2I PET scan. Two subgroups of patients had a second examination after either 12±7d (test-retest: 10 PD patients, 63±9y) or 2±0y (longitudinal: 12 PD patients, 62±8y). All PET measurements were used to calculate SBR for MRI-based volumes of interest of the caudate nucleus and the putamen on summarized images during the early (15-45 min) and late (50-80 min) equilibrium using the cerebellum as reference region. The binding potential (BPND) according to the simplified reference tissue model served as gold standard. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis (PD vs. controls) was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for putamen SBR. In the cross-sectional cohort, Cohen´s d and coefficient of variation [CV] were measures of effect size and variability. In the test-retest cohort intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] and absolute percentage difference [APD] were measures of agreement. Annual percentage change (APC) of SBR was calculated for the longitudinal cohort.

Results: The ROC AUC was high for early and late SBR (0.996/0.990). The metrics of early SBR were more favourable and closer to the reference standard than late SBR in both caudate (d: 1.26 vs. 1.16; CV: 0.36 vs. 0.47; ICC: 0.95 vs. 0.90; mean APD: 8.0% vs. 14.0%) and putamen (d: 1.75 vs. 1.65; CV: 0.57 vs. 0.75; ICC: 0.90 vs. 0.80; mean APD: 8.8% vs. 17.8%). Mean APC was comparable for early and late SBR in the caudate (-7.3%/-7.5%) and in the putamen (-7.4/-8.5%). Conclusion: A 30 minute 18F-FE-PE2I PET acquisition during either early peak or late pseudo-equilibrium retains discriminative power to separate PD patients and healthy controls. However, the better test-retest reliability of the early peak equilibrium indicates that this acquisition is preferable if 18F-FE-PE2I is used as marker for disease severity and progression. Acknowledgements: This work has been supported by the grants from Swedish Science Council, a private donation, Åhlen Foundation and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, BR 6121/1-1).

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Early peak equilibrium is superior to late pseudo-equilibrium for simplified quantification of 18F-FE-PE2I PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Early peak equilibrium is superior to late pseudo-equilibrium for simplified quantification of 18F-FE-PE2I PET
Joachim Brumberg, Vera Kerstens, Zsolt Cselenyi, Per Svenningsson, Sundgren Mathias, Patrik Fazio, Andrea Varrone
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 455;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Early peak equilibrium is superior to late pseudo-equilibrium for simplified quantification of 18F-FE-PE2I PET
Joachim Brumberg, Vera Kerstens, Zsolt Cselenyi, Per Svenningsson, Sundgren Mathias, Patrik Fazio, Andrea Varrone
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 455;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

  • Relationships between tau, atrophy, regional brain activity and connectivity in Alzheimer's disease: a PET/MRI multimodal study
  • Gray matter structural networks related to 18F-THK5351 retention in cognitively normal older adults and early Alzheimer’s disease patients
  • Assessment of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) availability and neuronal response to rewarding food-cues in human obesity using simultaneous PET-MRI
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Novel Neuroimaging Approaches

  • Preliminary Evidence for [11C]PBR28 Sensitivity to Alcohol Challenge in Human Brain
  • Discovery of Subtype Selective Phosphodiesterase-4D (PDE4D) Ligands and Evaluation as Potential Radioligands for Brain Imaging in Monkey and Human
Show more Novel Neuroimaging Approaches

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire