Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Determining the impact of body truncation correction on PET SUV values using F-18 DCFPyL in Whole-Body PET/MR imaging

Rosanna Chan, Douglas Hussey, Sangkyu Moon, Josh Schaefferkoetter, Claudia Ortega, Ur Metser and Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3111;
Rosanna Chan
1University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital Toronto ON Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas Hussey
2Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto ON Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sangkyu Moon
3University Health Network Toronto ON Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josh Schaefferkoetter
4Toronto ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Ortega
5Join Department Medical Imaging University Health Network. University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ur Metser
4Toronto ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Veit-Haibach
6UHN Toronto ON Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3111

Objectives: Truncation techniques for attenuation correction maps (µ maps) have been widely used to better estimate SUV values for PET/MR imaging. Attenuation correction with truncation techniques can either use the PET emission data to create a maximum likelihood of activity and attenuation (MLAA) image or use the data acquired from a MR sequence that optimizes the readout gradients and compensates for artifacts due to B0 inhomogeneities, HUGE (B0 Homogenization Using Gradient Enhancement) [1]. Currently, there is a lack of data comparing the SUV values of reference tissues (parotid, blood pool and liver) and lesions for whole Body PET/MR imaging reconstructed with and without truncation techniques using a PSMA agent. This study aims to determine the variability in SUV values in reference tissues and lesions in whole body PET/MR imaging using F-18 DCFPyL reconstructed with (extended FOV using MLAA and HUGE) and without (2-point DIXON only) truncation techniques.

Methods: Whole body PET/MR images from 10 male patients injected with F18-DCFPyL (300MBq ±10%) were analyzed retrospectively. At 158mins (±10mins) post injection, images were acquired from vertex to mid-thigh using 5 bed positions at 2mins each. PET/MR data were reconstructed using the 2-point Dixon MR AC, HDPET (Point-spread function), 3 iterations with 21 subsets, 172x172 matrix, Gaussian filter with a FWHM of 5mm and absolute scatter correction. The data were also post processed with 3 different MRAC µ maps: 1) the standard (2-point DIXON), 2) the standard with the MLAA truncation technique and 3) the standard with HUGE truncation technique. Sphere VOIs were drawn over the right parotid gland (1cm3 ±0.5cm3), the left ventricle cavity as a representative of blood pool (3cm3 ±0.5cm3), the caudal aspect of the right liver lobe (3cm3 ±0.5cm3) and PSMA avid lesions on all 3 sets of images. SUVmax, and SUVmean were calculated for all VOIs.

Results: Compared to PET AC images using the standard 2-point DIXON µ map, the PET data with µ maps using the HUGE and MLAA techniques have a higher increase in SUVmax and SUVmean for the blood pool and liver than the parotid. The average increase using the HUGE technique compared to the standard for the blood pool was 16-20% while the increase was 4-5% using MLAA. As for the liver, the average increase using HUGE was 24-30% and 5-6% using MLAA. With the parotid, there was a change of less than 1% with HUGE and 2-3% with MLAA. The total average difference in SUVmax and SUVmean of PSMA lesions increased by 35-40% using HUGE and 4-5% using MLAA. All results produced a p-value of less than 0.05.

Conclusions: When using truncation techniques for MRAC µ maps, there is an overall increase in SUV values for liver and blood pool reference tissues and lesions. Compared to the MLAA technique, the HUGE technique produced a higher percentage of change. While performing longitudinal studies using F-18 DCFPyL in whole body PET/MR imaging with semi-quantitative methods, the same truncation techniques should be maintained in order to preserve consistency.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Determining the impact of body truncation correction on PET SUV values using F-18 DCFPyL in Whole-Body PET/MR imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Determining the impact of body truncation correction on PET SUV values using F-18 DCFPyL in Whole-Body PET/MR imaging
Rosanna Chan, Douglas Hussey, Sangkyu Moon, Josh Schaefferkoetter, Claudia Ortega, Ur Metser, Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3111;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Determining the impact of body truncation correction on PET SUV values using F-18 DCFPyL in Whole-Body PET/MR imaging
Rosanna Chan, Douglas Hussey, Sangkyu Moon, Josh Schaefferkoetter, Claudia Ortega, Ur Metser, Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3111;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
  • Simplifying and Confirming Ketosis: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Cardiac Sarcoid Assessment
Show more

Technologist Poster Session

  • Impact of BSREM reconstruction algorithm on image quality and quantification accuracy of PET-a phantom study
  • PET/CT annual AAPM quality control: Practical implications for technologists.
  • Initial Experience with routine 15O-water cardiac PET workflow
Show more Technologist Poster Session

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire