Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Diagnostic performance of rapid whole-body FDG PET/MRI in oncology patients: Assessment of optimal beta-value for block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction and combination of whole-body MR sequences

Junko Inukai, Munenobu Nogami, Feibi Zeng, Yoshiaki Watanabe, Mizuho Nishio, Tomonori Kanda, Keitaro Sofue, Atsushi Kono, Kazuhiro Kubo and Takamichi Murakami
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1356;
Junko Inukai
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Munenobu Nogami
2Department of Radiology Kobe University Hospital Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feibi Zeng
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiaki Watanabe
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mizuho Nishio
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomonori Kanda
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keitaro Sofue
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Kono
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuhiro Kubo
2Department of Radiology Kobe University Hospital Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takamichi Murakami
1Department of Radiology Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe, Hyogo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1356

Purpose: The prolonged examination time for PET/MRI, due to the requirement for whole-body and regional scans, is a major drawback. A Block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction (Q.Clear) controls image noise and enables a short emission time without image degradation, to yield a fully convergent PET image. The primary purpose of the study was to assess the optimized beta (β) value of time-of-flight (TOF) BSREM, for a rapid emission scan. The secondary purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BSREM with a determined β value and selected MR sequences in comparison with a conventional TOF ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction with standard emission time and full MR sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with pathologically confirmed malignancy, who consecutively underwent whole-body F-18 FDG PET/MRI, were retrospectively evaluated. Three different emission scan durations (2.5 min, 1.5 min, and 1.0 min) and four different β values (500, 600, 700, and 800) were applied to the list mode reconstructions of PET, with point-spread function recovery. To assess the optimal β value, BSREM in a short scan duration (1.5 min and 1.0 min) were statistically compared with OSEM (16 subsets, 2 iterations, and 4 mm Gaussian filter) in a standard scan duration (2.5 min). Two nuclear medicine physicians evaluated the image quality against 5-point visual scores for liver noise level, SUV of the lesions, signal to background ratio (SBR), and signal to noise ratio (SNR). To determine the diagnostic performance for BSREM with determined β value and selected MR sequences acquirable during emission scan, the images obtained from BSREM and OSEM in different scan durations were visually evaluated by two readers with 5-point visual scores regarding differentiation of each lesion between benign and malignant. The reference standards were acquired by histopathological results and/or follow-up radiological examinations, during the 6 month follow-up period.

Results: A total of 257 lesions in 54 patients were evaluated for the primary purpose. According to the Wilcoxon’s signed rank test and the Bland and Altman plot, no significant differences in visual scores for liver noise level, lesion SUVmax, and lesion SBR, were observed between BSREM with β value between 500 and 600 in 1.5 min scan duration, BSREM with β value between 600 and 700 in 1.0 min scan duration, and OSEM in 2.5 min scan duration. To avoid a clustering bias for further statistical analysis, 173 lesions in 54 patients were randomly selected. The receiver operating characteristics curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for BSREM with β600 in 1.5 min scan duration, and β700 in 1.0 min scan duration was significantly larger than the AUC for OSEM in 1.5 min scan duration for experienced reader (p=0.0204 and p=0.0265, respectively) and OSEM in 1.0 min scan duration for both, experienced (p=0.0030 and p=0.0031, respectively) and novice reader (p=0.0372 and p=0.0372, respectively). No significant difference was observed for AUC between BSREM in 1.5 min and 1.0 min scan durations and OSEM in 2.5min (experienced, p=0.7758 and p=0.6645; novice, p=0.7745 and p=0.7745, respectively) scan duration. Moreover, the 95% confidence intervals of the difference (experienced, -0.0117-0.0157 and -0.0109-0.0171; novice, -0.0189-0.0253 and -0.0189-0.0253, respectively) were more than the fixed-margin of -2% for the noninferiority test.

Conclusions: TOF-BSREM with optimal β value and selected MR sequences enables a rapid whole-body PET/MRI examination in less than 1.5 minutes per bed position. No image degeneration occurs, and the diagnostic performance is equivalent to the conventional TOF-OSEM in 2.5 min.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic performance of rapid whole-body FDG PET/MRI in oncology patients: Assessment of optimal beta-value for block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction and combination of whole-body MR sequences
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic performance of rapid whole-body FDG PET/MRI in oncology patients: Assessment of optimal beta-value for block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction and combination of whole-body MR sequences
Junko Inukai, Munenobu Nogami, Feibi Zeng, Yoshiaki Watanabe, Mizuho Nishio, Tomonori Kanda, Keitaro Sofue, Atsushi Kono, Kazuhiro Kubo, Takamichi Murakami
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1356;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic performance of rapid whole-body FDG PET/MRI in oncology patients: Assessment of optimal beta-value for block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction and combination of whole-body MR sequences
Junko Inukai, Munenobu Nogami, Feibi Zeng, Yoshiaki Watanabe, Mizuho Nishio, Tomonori Kanda, Keitaro Sofue, Atsushi Kono, Kazuhiro Kubo, Takamichi Murakami
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1356;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Manual and Computer-Generated Methods for Segmentation of the Aorta in Lymphoma Patients from PET/CT Imaging
  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
Show more

Other Solid Tumors (Poster Session)

  • Value of FDG PET/CT in predicting the simplified WHO grade of malignancy in thymic epithelial tumors
  • The diagnostic value of time-of-flight 68Ga- PSMA-11 PET-MR in prostate cancer and compared with PET/CT
  • The predictive role of PET/CT and bioumoral parameters in immunotherapy
Show more Other Solid Tumors (Poster Session)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire