Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research Article1970s

Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography (perspective on “Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography” J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210–224)

David W. Townsend and Terry Jones
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 42S-56S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.248989
David W. Townsend
1National University of Singapore (retired), Singapore, Singapore; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry Jones
2University of California, Davis, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The seminal paper by Phelps, Hoffman, Mullani, and Ter-Pogossian (1) from Washington University, St Louis, appeared just a couple of years after Godfrey Hounsfield presented the first CT images using x-rays. The CT scanner was a breakthrough that demonstrated the feasibility of imaging cross-sections of the human body without interference from the sections above and below. Even before Hounsfield’s pioneering CT device, David Kuhl and coworkers were exploring such a tomographic approach using single-photon counting in nuclear medicine with their Mark I–IV scintillation scanners, whereas Thomas Budinger and others used an Anger scintillation camera to acquire transaxial tomographic reconstructions. The first tomographic reconstructions using annihilation coincidence detection were obtained by David Chesler from Gordon Brownell’s group at Massachusetts General Hospital using a planar positron camera designed by the Boston group. Chesler applied filtered backprojection for the first time to medical imaging in 1971.

Phelps and coworkers were the first to propose a positron emission transaxial tomograph (PETT) comprising an array of individual detectors placed around a single transaxial plane. The design acquired transaxial tomograms of the positron-emitting distribution with optimized sensitivity for that plane. Furthermore, the reconstructed images exhibited a high signal-to-noise ratio and were quantitative in that the voxel concentration of a positron emitter could actually be measured. Earlier devices suffered from high dead times and recorded elevated rates of random and scattered coincidences, thereby reducing signal-to-noise ratio. However, the St. Louis design with individual detectors achieved depth-independent spatial resolution and sensitivity, a low dead time, and a low scatter fraction by applying an energy window and axial shielding. The uptake of the positron-emitting nuclide could be quantified through attenuation correction and calibration. The substantially superior performance of the annihilation coincidence detection system was further demonstrated by comparison with single-photon counting, where depth-dependent resolution and sensitivity, a lack of attenuation correction, and low intrinsic count rates resulted in high-noise, low-resolution, nonquantitative images. This comparison highlighted the difference between the “electronic” collimation capability of annihilation coincidence detection and the need for physical collimation with single-photon counting. The feasibility and performance of the PETT design were demonstrated by imaging phantoms and a dog. The results encouraged the group to develop a larger, single-plane PETT scanner that could accommodate a human (2), demonstrating for the first time that the concentration of a positron-emitting radionuclide could be measured quantitatively and noninvasively in human tissue (3).

The impact on PETT (subsequently termed PET, positron emission tomography) of this work from St. Louis in 1975 was profound, even though at the time very few centers worldwide were exploring the use of positron-emitting nuclides for medical imaging. Nevertheless, a sustained interest in PET led Phelps and Hoffman (after they relocated from St. Louis to UCLA) to collaborate with EG&G Ortec to design and build a commercial version of their prototype (1) that became known as the ECAT II (4). Several centers worldwide invested in this device, attracted by the ability to actually measure physiologic parameters such as blood flow, oxygen utilization, glucose consumption (5), and amino acid metabolism in both health and disease. Given this paradigm shift in medical imaging, interest in PET increased, and in 1981, a refined hexagonal array for brain imaging, the NeuroECAT, was developed, again in collaboration with EG&G Ortec. Then, in 1984, the hexagonal design of the 1975 prototype was replaced with a circular array of detectors in the ECAT III PET scanner. This circular geometry would become the design standard for future PET scanners.

A major limitation of the designs described above was that each detector comprised a scintillator coupled to a photodetector, an expensive and limited solution as the demand grew for higher spatial resolution and coverage of an increased axial length of the human body by incorporating additional rings of detectors. Around 1984, Computer Technology and Imaging (CTI), a spin-off from EG&G Ortec, developed a breakthrough block detector module (6) that allowed up to 64 scintillators to be coupled to only 4 photodetectors. The block detector provided a cost-effective solution for a PET scanner design comprising multiple rings of detectors. Compared with the pioneering PETT prototype, subsequent scanner generations have incorporated better spatial resolution, greater sensitivity, faster data acquisition, lower random and scattered coincidence rates, lower detector dead time, greatly increased axial coverage, and recording of time-of-flight data. The fundamental concept of electronic collimation has been extended to fully 3-dimensional acquisition, eliminating the need for interplane shielding, and, more recently, the high-resolution molecular images have been complemented with high-resolution anatomic images through the combinations of PET/CT (in 2001) and PET/MR (in 2010).

The 24-detector PETT was able to record, within a 2.5-cm axial and approximately 16-cm transaxial field of view, only 12 coincidence lines of response at any one time, and with rotation and linear offset a total of 1,728 lines of response could be recorded for the reconstruction. At the conclusion of their paper, Phelps et al. speculated on the potential to increase the number of lines of response by extending the electronic collimation concept. Nothing illustrates the tremendous progress in PET scanner design over the past four and a half decades more than the fact that the current EXPLORER total-body PET scanner incorporates 564,480 detectors and 92 × 109 lines of response and covers 198 cm axially of the human body.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Phelps ME,
    2. Hoffman EJ,
    3. Mullani NA,
    4. Ter-Pogossian MM
    . Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210–224.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hoffman EJ,
    2. Phelps ME,
    3. Mullani NA,
    4. Higgins CS,
    5. Ter-Pogossian MM
    . Design and performance of a whole-body positron emission tomograph. J Nucl Med. 1976;17:493–502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Eichling JO,
    2. Higgins CS,
    3. Ter-Pogossian MM
    . Determination of radionuclide concentrations with positron CT scanning (PETT): concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1977;18:845–847.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Williams CW,
    2. Crabtree MC,
    3. Burgiss SG
    . Design and performance characteristics of a positron emission computed axial tomograph—ECAT®-II. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1979;26:619–627.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Phelps ME,
    2. Huang SC,
    3. Hoffman EJ,
    4. Selin C,
    5. Sokoloff L,
    6. Kuhl DE
    . Tomographic measurements of local cerebral rate in humans with (F-18) 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: validation of methods. Ann Neurol. 1979;6:371–388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Casey ME,
    2. Nutt R
    . A multicrystal two dimensional BGO detector system for positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1986;33:460–463.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  • Received for publication May 4, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication May 7, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue Supplement 2
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography (perspective on “Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography” J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210–224)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography (perspective on “Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography” J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210–224)
David W. Townsend, Terry Jones
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 42S-56S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.248989

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography (perspective on “Application of Annihilation Coincidence Detection to Transaxial Reconstruction Tomography” J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210–224)
David W. Townsend, Terry Jones
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 42S-56S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.248989
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gallagher’s Principle of Metabolic Trapping (perspective on “Metabolic Trapping as a Principle of Radiopharmaceutical Design: Some Factors Responsible for Biodistribution of [18F]2-Deoxy-2-Fluoro-D-Glucose” J Nucl Med. 1978;19:1154–1161)
  • Labeled Leukocyte Imaging: Dawn of an Era (perspective on “Indium-111-Labeled Autologous Leukocytes in Man” J Nucl Med. 1977;18:1014–1021)
  • Pharmacologic Stress Testing: Its Roots, Its Impact, and Its Future (perspective on “Myocardial Imaging with Thallium-201: Effect of Cardiac Drugs on Myocardial Images and Absolute Tissue Distribution” J Nucl Med. 1978;19:10–16)
Show more 1970s

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire