Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
Research ArticleTheranostics

Factors Predicting Metastatic Disease in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET–Positive Osseous Lesions in Prostate Cancer

Le Wen Chiu, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Spencer C. Behr, Roxanna Juarez, Paola M. Perez, Iryna Lobach, Matthew D. Bucknor, Thomas A. Hope and Robert R. Flavell
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (12) 1779-1785; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.241174
Le Wen Chiu
1School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Lawhn-Heath
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer C. Behr
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roxanna Juarez
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paola M. Perez
1School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iryna Lobach
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew D. Bucknor
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Hope
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Flavell
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
4Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Bone is the most common site of distant metastatic spread in prostate adenocarcinoma. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake has been described in both benign and malignant bone lesions, which can lead to false-positive findings on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for osseous prostate cancer metastases and improve bone uptake interpretation using semiquantitative metrics. Methods: Fifty-six prostate cancer patients (18 before prostatectomy and 38 with biochemical recurrence) who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI or PET/CT examinations with osseous PSMA-ligand uptake were included in the study. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively by board-certified nuclear radiologists to determine true or false positivity based on a composite endpoint. For each avid osseous lesion, we measured biologic volume; size; PSMA Reporting and Data System (RADS) rating; SUVmax; and ratio of lesion SUVmax to liver, blood pool, and background bone SUVmax. Differences between benign and malignant lesions were evaluated for statistical significance, and cutoffs for these parameters were determined to maximize diagnostic accuracy. Results: Among 56 participants, 13 (22.8%) had false-positive osseous 68Ga-PSMA-11 findings and 43 (76.8%) had true-positive osseous 68Ga-PSMA-11 findings. Twenty-two patients (39%) had 1 osseous lesion, 18 (32%) had 2–4 lesions, and 16 (29%) had 5 or more lesions. Cutoffs resulting in statistically significant (P < 0.005) differences between benign and malignant lesions were a PSMA RADS rating of at least 4, an SUVmax of at least 4.1, and SUVmax ratios of at least 2.11 for lesion to blood pool, at least 0.55 for lesion to liver, and at least 4.4 for lesion to bone. These measurements corresponded to a lesion-based 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET lesion detection rate of 80%, 93%, 89%, 21%, and 89%, respectively, for malignancy, and a specificity of 73%, 73%, 73%, 93%, and 60%, respectively. Conclusion: PSMA RADS rating, SUVmax, and SUVmax ratio for lesion to blood pool can help differentiate benign from malignant lesions on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. An SUVmax ratio of more than 2.2 for lesion to blood pool is a reasonable parameter to support image interpretation and presented a superior lesion detection rate and specificity when compared with visual interpretation by PSMA RADS. These parameters hold clinical value by improving diagnostic accuracy for metastatic prostate cancer on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI and PET/CT.

  • PSMA PET
  • prostate cancer
  • osseous metastasis

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 17, 2020.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 12
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors Predicting Metastatic Disease in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET–Positive Osseous Lesions in Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Factors Predicting Metastatic Disease in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET–Positive Osseous Lesions in Prostate Cancer
Le Wen Chiu, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Spencer C. Behr, Roxanna Juarez, Paola M. Perez, Iryna Lobach, Matthew D. Bucknor, Thomas A. Hope, Robert R. Flavell
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (12) 1779-1785; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.241174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Factors Predicting Metastatic Disease in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET–Positive Osseous Lesions in Prostate Cancer
Le Wen Chiu, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Spencer C. Behr, Roxanna Juarez, Paola M. Perez, Iryna Lobach, Matthew D. Bucknor, Thomas A. Hope, Robert R. Flavell
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (12) 1779-1785; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.241174
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Assessing Response to [177Lu]PSMA Radioligand Therapy using modified PSMA PET Progression Criteria
  • 177Lu-Labeled Albumin-Binder–Conjugated PSMA-Targeting Agents with Extremely High Tumor Uptake and Enhanced Tumor-to-Kidney Absorbed Dose Ratio
  • High Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System SSTR-RADS 1.0 on Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Treatment Monitoring of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Using 18F-FET PET in Patients with Melanoma and Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: Initial Experiences
  • Deep-Learning Generation of Synthetic Intermediate Projections Improves 177Lu SPECT Images Reconstructed with Sparsely Acquired Projections
  • Lymphocyte Infiltration Determines the Hypoxia-Dependent Response to Definitive Chemoradiation in Head-and-Neck Cancer: Results from a Prospective Imaging Trial
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PSMA PET
  • prostate cancer
  • osseous metastasis
SNMMI

© 2021 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire