Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
Research ArticleTheranostics
Open Access

Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

Frederik L. Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Leon Will, Tobias Maurer, Paul Flechsig, Oliver Neels, Kilian Schiller, Horacio Amaral, Wolfgang A. Weber, Uwe Haberkorn, Markus Schwaiger, Clemens Kratochwil, Peter Choyke, Vasko Kramer, Klaus Kopka and Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2019, 60 (3) 362-368; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.212233
Frederik L. Giesel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
3CCU Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karina Knorr
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Spohn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leon Will
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Maurer
5Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Flechsig
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Neels
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
6Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kilian Schiller
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Horacio Amaral
8Center of Nuclear Medicine, PositronMed, FALP, Santiago, Chile; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang A. Weber
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
3CCU Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Schwaiger
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Kratochwil
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Choyke
9Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vasko Kramer
8Center of Nuclear Medicine, PositronMed, FALP, Santiago, Chile; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Kopka
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
6Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted PET imaging recently emerged as a new method for the staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Most published studies investigated the diagnostic potential of 68Ga-labeled PSMA agents that are excreted renally. 18F-PSMA-1007 is a novel PSMA ligand that has excellent preclinical characteristics and that is only minimally excreted by the urinary tract, a potential advantage for pelvic imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. Methods: From 3 academic centers, 251 patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy were evaluated in a retrospective analysis. Patients who had received second-line androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or chemotherapy were excluded, but prior first-line ADT exposure was allowed. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 1.2 ng/mL (range, 0.2–228 ng/mL). All patients underwent PSMA PET/CT at 92 ± 26 min after injection of 301 ± 46 MBq of 18F-PSMA-1007. The rate of detection of presumed recurrence sites was correlated with the PSA level and original primary Gleason score. A comparison to a subset of patients treated previously with ADT was undertaken. Results: Of the 251 patients, 204 (81.3%) had evidence of recurrence on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The detection rates were 94.0% (79/84), 90.9% (50/55), 74.5% (35/47), and 61.5% (40/65) for PSA levels of greater than or equal to 2, 1 to less than 2, 0.5 to less than 1, and 0.2 to less than 0.5 ng/mL, respectively. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT revealed local recurrence in 24.7% of patients (n = 62). Lymph node metastases were present in the pelvis in 40.6% of patients (n = 102), in the retroperitoneum in 19.5% of patients (n = 49), and in supradiaphragmatic locations in 12.0% of patients (n = 30). Bone and visceral metastases were detected in 40.2% of patients (n = 101) and in 3.6% of patients (n = 9), respectively. In tumors with higher Gleason scores (≤7 vs. ≥8), detection efficacy trended higher (76.3% vs. 86.7%) but was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). However, detection efficacy was higher in patients who had received ADT (91.7% vs. 78.0%) within 6 mo before imaging (P = 0.0179). Conclusion: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT offers high detection rates for BCR after radical prostatectomy that are comparable to or better than those published for 68Ga-labeled PSMA ligands.

  • 18F-PSMA-1007
  • PET/CT
  • hybrid imaging
  • prostate cancer
  • biochemical recurrence

Footnotes

  • Published online Jul. 24, 2018.

  • © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 3
March 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Frederik L. Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Leon Will, Tobias Maurer, Paul Flechsig, Oliver Neels, Kilian Schiller, Horacio Amaral, Wolfgang A. Weber, Uwe Haberkorn, Markus Schwaiger, Clemens Kratochwil, Peter Choyke, Vasko Kramer, Klaus Kopka, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 362-368; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.212233

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Frederik L. Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Leon Will, Tobias Maurer, Paul Flechsig, Oliver Neels, Kilian Schiller, Horacio Amaral, Wolfgang A. Weber, Uwe Haberkorn, Markus Schwaiger, Clemens Kratochwil, Peter Choyke, Vasko Kramer, Klaus Kopka, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 362-368; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.212233
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Primary Local Therapy
  • 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
  • Intraindividual Comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 with Renally Excreted PSMA Ligands for PSMA PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of Biodistribution and PET Image Quality of a Novel Radiohybrid PSMA, 18F-rhPSMA-7, in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Treatment
  • Prospective Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer in an Academic Center: A Focus on Disease Localization and Changes in Management
  • Theranostics Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein in the Tumor Stroma: 64Cu- and 225Ac-Labeled FAPI-04 in Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard
  • Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Low PSA Values <= 0.5 ng/mL
  • Prospective Evaluation of PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
  • Multimodality Imaging of Prostate Cancer
  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine as an Independent Specialty
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • First-in-human study of novel SSTR antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: dosimetry, safety and efficacy
  • Dissimilar DNA Damage to Blood Lymphocytes After 177Lu-Labeled DOTATOC or Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Therapy
  • Multimodal Imaging of 2-Cycle PRRT with 177Lu-DOTA-JR11 and 177Lu-DOTATOC in an Orthotopic Neuroendocrine Xenograft Tumor Mouse Model
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Fluorescence-Guided Visualization of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas by Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A: A Phase 1 Single-Center Clinical Trial
  • Diagnostic Performance of Pulmonary Embolism Imaging in Patients with History of Asthma
  • Head-to-Head Evaluation of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-PSMA-1007
  • PET/CT
  • hybrid imaging
  • prostate cancer
  • Biochemical recurrence
SNMMI

© 2021 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire