Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Impact of personalized selection of Quiescent phase gating parameters with Q.Static PET/CT imaging

Joseph Meier and Osama Mawlawi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1714;
Joseph Meier
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osama Mawlawi
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1714

Objectives: Respiratory motion in static whole body(SWB) PET/CT results in underestimations of measured lesion activity concentration. Phase based gating(PBG) divides the pet data into multiple phases for each respiratory cycle, reducing blur but increasing noise. Patients tend to spend more time in the quiescent phase of the breathing cycle, but to varying degrees. General Electric has implemented quiescent phase gating as the Q.Static algorithm which selects data from each respiratory cycle with a default phase offset(typically 35%) and window width(typically 40%) resulting in a selection of a fixed phase range from 35-75%. This work investigates the effects of personalizing the selection of the phase offset and window width compared to the default settings for a cohort of patients impacted by respiratory motion.

Methods: 10 patients acquired using a 4D PET/CT research protocol, having lung or liver lesions less than 3cm in diameter and impacted by respiratory motion were analyzed in this study. All patients were scanned on a GE Discovery 690 PET/CT. A 12 minute list mode acquisition with respiratory gating using the Varian RPM was acquired over the region impacted by respiratory motion. Triggers were retrospectively inserted into the LIST file at the 0% phase for all respiratory cycles. A 2-10s trigger to trigger acceptance widow was applied. QStatic data was then unlisted using 5 windows widths of 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 %. For each window width, 8 phase offsets were used (29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, and 50). Additionally, for each respiratory cycle we unlisted the data by selecting the ideal offset (OFS ideal) based on the least integral amplitude for each of the 5 window widths. For all cases, the length of unlisted data was changed to keep similar counting statistics across all window widths(12 min for 20% window, 6 min for 40% window). Attenuation correction of the PET data was done using the 56% percent phase from 4DCT for all reconstructions. For all reconstructions, 2it 24ss 6.4mm, TOF, PSF, and 192 x 192 matrix was used. All reconstructions were performed on the GE Discovery 710 PET/CT using QStatic. The SUVmax and SUVpeak of one lesion was analyzed for each of the ten patients. The SUV ratio (max and peak) of the various selections compared to the default QStatic parameters (OFS_4035) were calculated and then the maximum value for each window width and offset combination (OFSmax) were determined. For each window width, for all tumors, the average of the phase offset(not including OFS_ideal) having the highest SUV ratio was calculated . For each window width, the number of times that OFS_ideal resulted in the highest SUV ratio was determined.

Results: The average SUVmax ratios of OFSmax/OFS_4035 were 1.04, 1.08, 1.10, 1.12, and 1.13, for window widths of 40, 35, 30, 25, and 20 respectively. The average SUVpeak ratios of OFSmax/OFS_4035 were 1.02, 1.04, 1.05, 1.06, and 1.07 for window widths of 40, 35, 30, 25, and 20 respectively. The average offset that had the highest SUVmax ratios of OFSmax/OFS_4035 were 31.5, 34.6, 38.6, 35.8, and 43.5 for window widths of 40, 35, 30, 25, and 20 respectively. The average offset that had the highest SUVpeak ratios of OFSmax/OFS_4035 was 31.8, 36.5, 39.2, 40.1, and 42.9 for window widths of 40, 35, 30, 25, and 20 respectively. For SUVmax, the number of times the OFS ideal resulted in the highest ratios of OFSmax/OFS_4035 were 4, 3, 5, 5, and 3 times for window widths of 40, 35, 30, 25, and 20 respectively. For SUVpeak, OFS ideal resulted in the highest ratios of OFSmax/OFS_4035 for 3, 5, 6, 6, and 5 times for window widths of 40, 35, 30, 25, and 20 respectively.

Conclusions: Personalization of quiescent phase parameter selection variably impacts tumor quantification depending on patient breathing waveform. Decreasing the window width had the largest impact on tumor quantification. Our work demonstrates in the majority of cases using a variable offset which is optimized to each patients individual respiratory cycles is superior to using a fixed phase offset

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of personalized selection of Quiescent phase gating parameters with Q.Static PET/CT imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of personalized selection of Quiescent phase gating parameters with Q.Static PET/CT imaging
Joseph Meier, Osama Mawlawi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1714;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of personalized selection of Quiescent phase gating parameters with Q.Static PET/CT imaging
Joseph Meier, Osama Mawlawi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1714;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography in Men with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • Preclinical validation of a single-scan rest/stress imaging technique for 13NH3 cardiac perfusion studies
  • Comparison of 22 partial volume correction methods for amyloid PET imaging with 11C-PiB
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Evaluation of Quantitative Whole Body Dynamic FDG-PET Using Block Sequence Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) Reconstruction
  • Feasibility of 18F-THK5351 PET quantitation using the Centiloid scale
  • NaF-PET/CT for assessment of temporomandibular joint osseous activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy subjects
Show more Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire