Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
Research ArticleTheranostics

64CuCl2 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Relapse

Arnoldo Piccardo, Francesco Paparo, Matteo Puntoni, Sergio Righi, Gianluca Bottoni, Lorenzo Bacigalupo, Silvia Zanardi, Andrea DeCensi, Giulia Ferrarazzo, Monica Gambaro, Filippo Grillo Ruggieri, Fabio Campodonico, Laura Tomasello, Luca Timossi, Simona Sola, Egesta Lopci and Manlio Cabria
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2018, 59 (3) 444-451; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.195628
Arnoldo Piccardo
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Paparo
2Department of Radiology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matteo Puntoni
3Clinical Trial Unit, Office of the Scientific Director, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio Righi
4Medical Physics Department, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianluca Bottoni
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorenzo Bacigalupo
2Department of Radiology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Zanardi
5Department of Oncology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea DeCensi
5Department of Oncology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulia Ferrarazzo
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica Gambaro
4Medical Physics Department, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Filippo Grillo Ruggieri
6Department of Radiotherapy, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Campodonico
7Department of Urology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Tomasello
8Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Martino IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca Timossi
9Department of Urology, E.O. Evangelico Internazionale Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simona Sola
10Department of Histopathology, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Egesta Lopci
11Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manlio Cabria
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the biodistribution, kinetics, and radiation dosimetry of 64CuCl2 in humans and to assess the ability of 64CuCl2 PET/CT to detect prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence in patients with biochemical relapse. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 50 PCa patients with biochemical relapse after surgery or external-beam radiation therapy. All patients underwent 64CuCl2 PET/CT, 18F-choline PET/CT, and multiparametric MRI within 15 d of each other. Experienced readers interpreted the images, and the detection rate (DR) of each imaging modality was calculated. Histopathology, when available; clinical or laboratory response; and multidisciplinary follow-up were used to confirm the site of disease. In parallel, biodistribution, kinetics of the lesions, and radiation dosimetry of 64CuCl2 were evaluated. Results: From a dosimetric point of view, an administered dose of 200 MBq for 64CuCl2 translated into a 5.7-mSv effective dose. Unlike 18F-choline, 64CuCl2 was not excreted or accumulated in the urinary tract, thus allowing thorough pelvic exploration. The maximum 64CuCl2 uptake at the sites of PCa relapse was observed 1 h after tracer injection. In our cohort, 64CuCl2 PET/CT proved positive in 41 of 50 patients, with an overall DR of 82%. The DRs of 18F-choline PET/CT and multiparametric MRI were 56% and 74%, respectively. The difference between the DRs of 64CuCl2 PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/CT was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Interestingly, on considering prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, 64CuCl2 PET/CT had a higher DR than 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with a PSA of less than 1 ng/mL. Conclusion: The biodistribution of 64CuCl2 is more suitable than that of 18F-choline for exploring the pelvis and prostatic bed. The 64CuCl2 effective dose is like those of other established PET tracers. In patients with biochemical relapse and a low PSA level, 64CuCl2 PET/CT shows a significantly higher DR than 18F-choline PET/CT.

  • prostate cancer
  • 64CuCl2
  • dosimetry
  • elderly
  • PET/CT

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Sep. 8, 2017.

  • © 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 3
March 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
64CuCl2 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Relapse
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
64CuCl2 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Relapse
Arnoldo Piccardo, Francesco Paparo, Matteo Puntoni, Sergio Righi, Gianluca Bottoni, Lorenzo Bacigalupo, Silvia Zanardi, Andrea DeCensi, Giulia Ferrarazzo, Monica Gambaro, Filippo Grillo Ruggieri, Fabio Campodonico, Laura Tomasello, Luca Timossi, Simona Sola, Egesta Lopci, Manlio Cabria
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2018, 59 (3) 444-451; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.195628

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
64CuCl2 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Relapse
Arnoldo Piccardo, Francesco Paparo, Matteo Puntoni, Sergio Righi, Gianluca Bottoni, Lorenzo Bacigalupo, Silvia Zanardi, Andrea DeCensi, Giulia Ferrarazzo, Monica Gambaro, Filippo Grillo Ruggieri, Fabio Campodonico, Laura Tomasello, Luca Timossi, Simona Sola, Egesta Lopci, Manlio Cabria
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2018, 59 (3) 444-451; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.195628
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • A New Type of Prostate Cancer Imaging: Will 64CuCl2 PET/CT Flourish or Vanish?
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of Novel PSMA Ligands for Imaging and Therapy with Copper Isotopes
  • The War Is Opened: PSMA vs. 64CUCL2 vs. Choline PET/CT
  • Insights into Trace Metal Metabolism in Health and Disease from PET: "PET Metallomics"
  • A New Type of Prostate Cancer Imaging: Will 64CuCl2 PET/CT Flourish or Vanish?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Assessing Response to [177Lu]PSMA Radioligand Therapy using modified PSMA PET Progression Criteria
  • 177Lu-Labeled Albumin-Binder–Conjugated PSMA-Targeting Agents with Extremely High Tumor Uptake and Enhanced Tumor-to-Kidney Absorbed Dose Ratio
  • High Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System SSTR-RADS 1.0 on Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Assessing Response to [177Lu]PSMA Radioligand Therapy using modified PSMA PET Progression Criteria
  • 177Lu-Labeled Albumin-Binder–Conjugated PSMA-Targeting Agents with Extremely High Tumor Uptake and Enhanced Tumor-to-Kidney Absorbed Dose Ratio
  • High Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System SSTR-RADS 1.0 on Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • 64CuCl2
  • dosimetry
  • elderly
  • PET/CT
SNMMI

© 2021 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire